Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs = dev-cpp moves

2005-05-09 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote: There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp: I know it's a bit late for this, but I'm slowly catching up on my unread emails: dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated to a C pre-processor? Can't categories contain the

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs = dev-cpp moves

2005-05-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 09 May 2005 08:35 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote: There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp: dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated to a C pre-processor? Can't categories contain the '+' char? e.g

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs = dev-cpp moves

2005-05-09 Thread Phil Richards
On 2005-05-09, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 09 May 2005 08:35 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote: There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp: dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated to a C

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs = dev-cpp moves

2005-05-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 09 May 2005 02:23 pm, Phil Richards wrote: On 2005-05-09, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 09 May 2005 08:35 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote: There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in