On Wednesday 18 July 2012 12:18:35 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:33 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
epatch is so widely used and basic that I wonder why it's still not
implemented as a real helper function.
Because then its harder to change, it must be in
On Wednesday 18 July 2012 13:29:41 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:18:35 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:33 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
epatch is so widely used and basic that I wonder why it's still
not implemented as a real
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:33 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
epatch is so widely used and basic that I wonder why it's still not
implemented as a real helper function.
Because then its harder to change, it must be in PMS, otherwise you
have to do things like test which version of
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:33 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
epatch is so widely used and basic that I wonder why it's still not
implemented as a real helper function.
Because then its harder to change, it must be in PMS, otherwise you
have to do things like test which version of
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:18:35 +0200
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:33 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
epatch is so widely used and basic that I wonder why it's still
not implemented as a real helper function.
Because then its harder
