Re: [gentoo-dev] mozilla{-bin}/gecko-sdk masking

2006-07-24 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi, Lack of time is fully understandable. It's a big package and takes a long time to compile and debug. Yeah, IMHO the whole mozilla stuff has been grown too big. nspr already should be fall apart into several packages, the XUL core another one, each

Re: [gentoo-dev] mozilla{-bin}/gecko-sdk masking

2006-07-01 Thread Ned Ludd
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 22:30 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ned Ludd wrote: On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 19:39 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote: As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I will be p.masking them tonight along with

Re: [gentoo-dev] mozilla{-bin}/gecko-sdk masking

2006-06-30 Thread Ned Ludd
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 19:39 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote: As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I will be p.masking them tonight along with gecko-sdk. This is gonna cause some issues with stable tree I am aware of this. As packages break please reference bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] mozilla{-bin}/gecko-sdk masking

2006-06-30 Thread Jory A. Pratt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ned Ludd wrote: On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 19:39 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote: As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I will be p.masking them tonight along with gecko-sdk. This is gonna cause some issues with stable tree I

Re: [gentoo-dev] mozilla{-bin}/gecko-sdk masking

2006-06-30 Thread Jason Wever
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 19:39:39 -0500 Jory A. Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I will be p.masking them tonight along with gecko-sdk. This is gonna cause some issues with stable tree I am aware of this. As packages break please