On 5 March 2013 15:07, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume
the package is properly maintained by him so
we never touch it.
Sounds fine. I for
On 17 March 2013 13:47, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 5 March 2013 15:07, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume
the package is
On 5 March 2013 03:41, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 19:35:24 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
A number of packages in the tree are maintained by a Gentoo developer
and a user. As a result of which, we are unable to monitor these
packages in
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:09:47 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
If there is at least one Gentoo developer in metadata.xml we assume
the package is properly maintained by him so
we never touch it.
Sounds fine. I for one am converted (and the packages I maintain in
that fashion).
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 19:35:24 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
A number of packages in the tree are maintained by a Gentoo developer
and a user. As a result of which, we are unable to monitor these
packages in bugzilla. This is useful in case one of the maintainers
goes MIA so
