On 04-07-2011 16:23:11 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 07:56:25PM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
Just one little note, which is that Prefix is stuck with a modified
version of baselayout-1. If your virtual is going to make it possible
to have no openrc, or some
On Monday, July 04, 2011 13:56:25 Fabian Groffen wrote:
Just one little note, which is that Prefix is stuck with a modified
version of baselayout-1.
why ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 05-07-2011 03:00:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday, July 04, 2011 13:56:25 Fabian Groffen wrote:
Just one little note, which is that Prefix is stuck with a modified
version of baselayout-1.
why ?
Because original baselayout-1 doesn't compile, and we don't need all it
provides.
On 04-07-2011 09:30:17 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
My goal with this virtual, once it is in the tree and keyworded
everywhere, is to add it to profiles/base/packages so that it will be
part of the system set. Then we could remove the PDEPEND from baselayout
and we would still be assured that
Hi Fabian,
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 07:56:25PM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
Just one little note, which is that Prefix is stuck with a modified
version of baselayout-1. If your virtual is going to make it possible
to have no openrc, or some openrc-light, then that would certainly
improve
