Re: [gentoo-dev] www-apps/otrs: needs new maintainer

2015-09-21 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
On 16.09.2015 09:15, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Well, my ebuilds for www-apps/otrs are in here already: > > https://github.com/stefangweichinger/gentoo-overlay/tree/master/www-apps/otrs > > (the other packages in that overlay aren't that up to date ... simply > some work collected over the

Re: [gentoo-dev] www-apps/otrs: needs new maintainer

2015-09-16 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 2015-09-16 um 02:37 schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:13:34PM +0200, hasufell wrote: >>> On 09/15/2015 02:00 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: If you have interest in this package then you can do one or

Re: [gentoo-dev] www-apps/otrs: needs new maintainer

2015-09-15 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:13:34PM +0200, hasufell wrote: >> On 09/15/2015 02:00 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: >> > If you have interest in this package then you can do one or more of: >> > * become a Gentoo developer (ha-ha)

Re: [gentoo-dev] www-apps/otrs: needs new maintainer

2015-09-15 Thread hasufell
On 09/15/2015 02:00 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > > If you have interest in this package then you can do one or more of: > > * become a Gentoo developer (ha-ha) hmm > * maintain the ebuild by proxy (find a Gentoo developer to proxy you) maybe, but not necessary for drive-by contributions > *

Re: [gentoo-dev] www-apps/otrs: needs new maintainer

2015-09-15 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:13:34PM +0200, hasufell wrote: > On 09/15/2015 02:00 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > > If you have interest in this package then you can do one or more of: > > * become a Gentoo developer (ha-ha) > hmm For background, SGW did work on becoming a developer once before, but he

Re: [gentoo-dev] www-apps/otrs: needs new maintainer

2015-09-15 Thread Peter Stuge
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > * the former dev has removed himself as maintainer > * the package is rather outdated now in portage > * there are some ebuilds already which could be considered to be added > (at least as unstable, sure) > > pls advise, If you have interest in this package then you