Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date

2005-09-12 Thread Jakub Moc
12.9.2005, 19:32:32, Carsten Lohrke wrote: > To have even more unmaintained packages in the tree. The tree it is that > needs QA. If "maintainer-wanted" bugs stay open forever - who cares. [left for later reference] > Thanks for the pointer. :p So from the user point of view it's better to fil

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date

2005-09-12 Thread Jakub Moc
12.9.2005, 16:03:17, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > Many users seem to think that a WONTFIX is non-negotiable. I tend to agree > with them, for the most part. Rather than WONTFIX them, simply tell them that > they won't be included as-is. WONTFIX gives the user the impression that we > are not intere