Hi,
#gentoo-uk are trying to organise Gentoo's attendance at the Linux World
UK Expo, if you're interested in attending/helping out, please have a
look at our co-ordination page on the Gentoo UK website:
http://gentoo.linux.co.uk/events/linuxworld05/
Please sign up and register for the event on
On Thursday 07 April 2005 15:20, Jason Stubbs wrote:
if package.prefer contained dev-java/kaffe then:
|| (
dev-java/blackdown-jdk
dev-java/sun-jdk
dev-java/kaffe
)
would be processed as:
|| (
dev-java/kaffe
dev-java/blackdown-jdk
dev-java/sun-jdk
)
I think
One thing... Maybe its just me... or maybe they are in no way related,
but I seem to have heard of a lot more 'libtool' problems when using a
snapshot version instead of a regularly numbered version, is there a
reason?
On Apr 7, 2005 11:46 PM, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can stable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:
can stable uses of gcc-3.3.5-r1 upgrade to gcc-3.3.5.20050110-r1 and see if
they hit any fun and exciting bugs ?
Uh, there isn't any such thing. If you mean this:
Mon Mar 21 14:05:58 2005
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:22:33AM +0200, Diego Flameeyes Petten wrote:
I was thinking of the virtual for future expansion on NetBSD and other, but
this is probably better done using an || PDEPEND when it will be needed.
On Friday 08 April 2005 07:57 pm, David Sparks wrote:
!!! ARCH is not set... Are you missing the /etc/make.profile symlink?
!!! Is the symlink correct? Is your portage tree complete?
so use 'default-x86-2004.2', emerge portage, and then switch to the cascading
version
-mike
--
On Friday 08 April 2005 08:24 pm, David Sparks wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 08 April 2005 07:57 pm, David Sparks wrote:
!!! ARCH is not set... Are you missing the /etc/make.profile symlink?
!!! Is the symlink correct? Is your portage tree complete?
so use 'default-x86-2004.2',
Question here - I made the link to the 2005.0 profile on (NOT 2005.0/2.4)
a system that is 2.6.11 and has been on 2.6 for months. Tonight emerge
-uD system -p wants to upgrade me to a 2.4 kernel!!! Well, portage this
is a 2.6.x system - not 2.4 - duh! From what I found in the mail list
On Friday 08 April 2005 09:21 pm, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
Nope. I got 2.4 when I logged in, did an emerge -uD system -p. I went back
and created the symlink to 2005.0 again and now it appears to work - I
even rebooted. However, I did NOT have a symlink to 2.4 so who knows.
well if you can
