Re: [gentoo-dev] SLOTed MySQL or not?

2006-03-10 Thread Ramon van Alteren
No dev but +1 from me. I liked slotted mysql a lot and use it extensively. It has helped us tremendously during our upgrade path and I would be very sad to see it go. Public opinion is just that, public opinion, doesn't neccesarily mean something went wrong. FWIW, I'd like to keep the

Re: [gentoo-dev] SLOTed MySQL or not?

2006-03-10 Thread Luca Longinotti
Ramon van Alteren wrote: No dev but +1 from me. I liked slotted mysql a lot and use it extensively. It has helped us tremendously during our upgrade path and I would be very sad to see it go. Public opinion is just that, public opinion, doesn't neccesarily mean something went wrong.

[gentoo-dev] Lugcamp 2006 in Ofterschwang / Germany

2006-03-10 Thread Markus Ullmann
Howdy, from 25. - 28.05.2006 there will be the yearly Lugcamp in Ofterschwang, Southern Germany/Border to Austria. In contrast to other events, this is only a small, non-commercial event to enjoy meet-and-greet, having fun doing useful/useless things and some sightseeing if your're interested.

[gentoo-dev] USE_EXPAND in IUSE ( again )

2006-03-10 Thread Alec Warner
So folks seem to want things both ways. Some people believe that USE_EXPAND'd variables are private: || I have yet to be enlightened on any merit of USE_EXPAND is so perhaps || you could explain as to why there should be || user-configured-yet-undocumented options for ebuilds? More precisely, ||

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE_EXPAND in IUSE ( again )

2006-03-10 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Saturday 11 March 2006 14:19, Alec Warner wrote: Either USE_EXPAND always goes in IUSE, or USE_EXPAND never goes in IUSE. Regardless of what is displayed, portage will eventually need to know what USE_EXPAND env vars are modifying the behaviour of an ebuild. Consider extending --newuse to

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Move PORTAGE_INST_UID and PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals?

2006-03-10 Thread Kito
On Mar 10, 2006, at 4:26 AM, Zac Medico wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, What do people think about moving PORTAGE_INST_UID and PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals? Would the profiles not be a more logical place to set these? If not, can we twist the logic to

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Enabling RSYNC_OPTIONS to be set in make.conf

2006-03-10 Thread Ned Ludd
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 14:38 -0600, Robert Larson wrote: Hello list, I am needing to allow for further configuration of rsync for syncing portage. The addition of RSYNC_OPTIONS in make.conf could alleviate this need for me, but what do you guys think? [snip] I think genone has a more