Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Monday 06 March 2006 20:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Alfredo has joined the Gentoo team to help with the games herd. I'm sure
>> he'll have a fun time "testing" all those games :)
> Welcome!
>
> We're really going to form a conspiracy now :P
>
Update the
Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> On 2/24/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Latest list:
>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060224
>
> scilab depend on virtual/x11 and is not in this list. Is your tool broken ?
No, it just checks the lat
On 3/12/06, R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i think a 'status' tag might also be handy to indicate if the package has an
> active upstream or not. either a text field or a predetermined set of
> possibilities ("active"/"inactive").
active/inactive sounds good enough for me, as long as people
There have been a few requests for negative indices in versionator,
where -1 would mean "the last component". This conflicts with the range
syntax, however, so the meaning of things like -2 would be inconsistent
between functions.
However... Getting the last index seems to be something that's need
On 2/24/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Latest list:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060224
scilab depend on virtual/x11 and is not in this list. Is your tool broken ?
Beber
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
