Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X: unmasking tonight, RFC
On 4/20/06, Stephen P. Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bertrand Jacquin wrote: On 4/19/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bertrand Jacquin wrote: Is it planned to release some xserver ebuilds ? Could you rephrase the question? I don't understand it. I can't any ebuild for xserver (http://www.jabber.no/ejabberd-1.0.0.tar.bz2) (X over vesa fb). Is it planned to make an ebuild available ? Beber What does a jabber server have to do with X on vesafb? Are you not satisfied with the vesa driver which is already part of modular Xorg, provided by the x11-drivers/xf86-video-vesa ebuild? Could you possibly rephrase your question so that it actually makes sense? Oh ok. Sorry for the bad URL but you answered to my request. Thanks. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Ati driver
Hello, i try to install new ati driver on my linux system. The installation on Xorg and the modprobe action for the fglrx module works very well, but wharn i try to start an X session, it exits with the follow error message : (EE) fglrx(0): No V_BIOS found(EE) fglrx(0): PreInitInt10 failedSetVBEMode failed(EE) fglrx(0): R200PreInit failed (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.Anyone has the same problem?
Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-server 1.0.99/1.1 ABI break
Donnie Berkholz schrieb: This also means that all binary drivers (nvidia, ati, etc) will be broken with xorg-server 1.1 and RC's until their upstream vendor provides a compatible update. Do you know whether these upstream vendors (I am interested in nVidia mostly) plan to release new drivers in time for the xorg-server 1.1 final release? -- Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/ GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ati driver
Roberto Griso wrote: Hello, i try to install new ati driver on my linux system. The installation on Xorg and the modprobe action for the fglrx module works very well, but wharn i try to start an X session, it exits with the follow error message : (EE) fglrx(0): No V_BIOS found (EE) fglrx(0): PreInitInt10 failed SetVBEMode failed (EE) fglrx(0): R200PreInit failed (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. Anyone has the same problem? Please use the gentoo-desktop mailing list for these kinds of questions. -Steve -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ati driver
Please use the gentoo-desktop mailing list for these kinds of questions.-Steve --gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing listthis is not gentoo-desktop mailing list question, vai a cacare, tu e tre quarti della palazzina tua.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ati driver
On Friday 21 April 2006 23:10, Roberto Griso wrote: Please use the gentoo-desktop mailing list for these kinds of questions. -Steve this is not gentoo-desktop mailing list question, This is not a gentoo-dev question either, this list is meant for us to talk about general development, policies, etc. Your mail is a bug report, and you need to search bugzilla. Chris White pgppRuP7EBK6u.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ati driver
On 4/21/06, Chris White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 21 April 2006 23:10, Roberto Griso wrote: Please use the gentoo-desktop mailing list for these kinds of questions. -Steve this is not gentoo-desktop mailing list question, This is not a gentoo-dev question either, this list is meant for us to talk about general development, policies, etc. Your mail is a bug report, and you need to search bugzilla. Chris White Another place you can ask are our forums: http://forums.gentoo.org/. Best regards, Stu -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ati driver
Roberto Griso wrote: Please use the gentoo-desktop mailing list for these kinds of questions. -Steve -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list this is not gentoo-desktop mailing list question, vai a cacare, tu e tre quarti della palazzina tua. Sorry, but it *is* a gentoo-desktop type question, seeing as it involves X. In fact, if you really want to get responses, it should have been posted to gentoo-user. Also, for the sake of your continuing subscription to this list, you probably shouldn't insult people in languages they don't understand, particularly when I can simply get a translation from some Italian folks I am acquainted with. -Steve -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] gnome-system-tools
I'm wondering why gnome-system-tools didn't complete till now, the network-admin is being disabled since gnome-2.10 and also disks. i want to know: what we need to get these tools to work ? is this a difficult proccess ? what i need to know to got them work ? are there any one working on them ? why gentoo uses a diffrent network configuration file format ?? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-server 1.0.99/1.1 ABI break
Sebastian Bergmann wrote: Donnie Berkholz schrieb: This also means that all binary drivers (nvidia, ati, etc) will be broken with xorg-server 1.1 and RC's until their upstream vendor provides a compatible update. Do you know whether these upstream vendors (I am interested in nVidia mostly) plan to release new drivers in time for the xorg-server 1.1 final release? They will release when they're ready. I'm not privy to their release dates, but I know they're aware of the changes. Thanks, Donnie signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Old-style PHP packages vanishing
Eldad Zack wrote: On Monday 17 April 2006 05:08, Luca Longinotti wrote: The PHP Herd announces that the old-style PHP packages, which were unsupported and deprecated for months, are finally going away. After months of work, the team considers the new dev-lang/php package and the related dev-php[4,5]/ categories fully ready for production use, and encourage all users to upgrade. Helpful informations can be found at the PHP project’s pages [1], along with a HOWTO [2] regarding the migration to dev-lang/php. The old-style PHP packages (dev-php/php, dev-php/php-cgi, dev-php/mod_php, dev-php/PECL-*, and older dev-php/PEAR-* packages) will be package.masked on Wednesday, 19 April 2006, and removed from the Portage tree about a month later. Just wanted to say a collective thank-you for the long tedious work you've done with php. Thanks guys! Me too, this was an awesome job. I use these packages on torrents.g.o and it works great. Thanks for all the hard work. :-) --curtis signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ati driver
Roberto Griso wrote: Please use the gentoo-desktop mailing list for these kinds of questions. -Steve -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list this is not gentoo-desktop mailing list question, vai a cacare, tu e tre quarti della palazzina tua. Complimenti, ottimo atteggiamento, hai meno di 10 anni vero ? Allora forse devi ancora imparare che: a) offendere qualcuno di un gruppo quando si fa una richiesta 'e perlomeno stupido. b) offenderlo in italiano ti fara' solo odiare dagli altri italiani che leggono questa lista, perche ci vergognamo di te. c) la domanda che hai posto veramente non ha senso qui, stai chiedendo aiuto per un problema di installazione, non per lo sviluppo di gentoo. trovati un altro posto dove possano rispondere alle tue domande, sui forum di gentoo oppure in quei tre quarti di palazzina che hai menzionato. English speaking ppl, sorry for the italian. - Francesco Riosa -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ati driver
On 4/21/06, Francesco Riosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Complimenti, ottimo atteggiamento, hai meno di 10 anni vero ? Allora forse devi ancora imparare che: a) offendere qualcuno di un gruppo quando si fa una richiesta 'e perlomeno stupido. b) offenderlo in italiano ti fara' solo odiare dagli altri italiani che leggono questa lista, perche ci vergognamo di te. c) la domanda che hai posto veramente non ha senso qui, stai chiedendo aiuto per un problema di installazione, non per lo sviluppo di gentoo. trovati un altro posto dove possano rispondere alle tue domande, sui forum di gentoo oppure in quei tre quarti di palazzina che hai menzionato. Congratulations, great attitude, you are not even 10, are you? Maybe you should still learn that: a) to offend anyone when you are asking a question is at the very least stupid. b) to do so in Italian will only bring hate from the other Italians who read this list, because it is shameful. c) the question you asked really makes no sense here, you are asking about an installation issue, not about Gentoo development. Try posting in a place where people can reply to your questions, like the Gentoo Forums or in that whore house [is this correct?] that you mentioned. From now on let us please resist the temptation of replying...? :-) Marcelo -- Marcelo Góes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] [Re:] gnome-system-tools
I found that if i add --enable-disks and replace --disable-network with --enable-network in the ebuild, then every thing works very well. the modified ebuild attached to this message. i think we should make it avaliable by default. I'm wondering why gnome-system-tools didn't complete till now, the network-admin is being disabled since gnome-2.10 and also disks. i want to know: what we need to get these tools to work ? is this a difficult proccess ? what i need to know to got them work ? are there any one working on them ? why gentoo uses a diffrent network configuration file format ?? gnome-system-tools-2.14.0-r99.ebuild Description: Binary data
Re: [gentoo-dev] [Re:] gnome-system-tools
On Friday 21 April 2006 15:20, Mohammed Hagag wrote: I found that if i add --enable-disks and replace --disable-network with --enable-network in the ebuild, then every thing works very well. file a bug -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Updating Council page with voting information
with the trustee voting process coming up i thought i should get on the ball and give a brief overview of the current Council election process so can people check out the new Voting section and tell me what ya'll think: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/ -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] efficient source for changes in the portage tree
Thans for your answer, I'll investigate that stuff. But currently more important for me is, where else in the web I can find informations about the updates in the portage tree. As I said, I can parse packages.gentoo.org, but it contains much overhead. ViewPortageX currently is used at least on 500 systems, but there come more and more. It would put some load on the server when I let the theme fetch so many information from packages.gentoo.org as I need it to do. So, perhaps somebody knows how I can do this more efficiently. Perhaps you may find portholes code easier to find out how to obtain info from portage. The portagelib.py file is where all portage interaction takes place. Since the devs know about what it uses already it is probably the safest code taps from portage to use. You should be able to get all the info you need from those examples. Also you may want to keep track of pkgcore_lib.py. It is the next generation portage code that will be coming our way. I have only just started integrating it for porthole (my first commit of it last night). Many things will change by the time the code is ready for general use, but will give you an idea of how to plan ahead. The tree structure is quite a bit different than current portage. I know I will need to re-do a bunch of porthole's code to be optimized for the new structure. Also it should be faster. So far, just building all the available packages from the local tree as well as all installed packages is about 1 sec. faster on my machine, probably better again when it's ironed out. If there is something lacking in it's API, Brian Harring wants to know. -- Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
