Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 27 Proposal - Feedback Requested

2006-05-30 Thread Danny van Dyk
Hello Mike, Am Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 05:29 schrieb Mike Kelly: I'm Mike Kelly, one of the SoC-ers. I'll be working on GLEP 27 for the summer. Right now I'm looking for some basic feedback on my proposal. In particular, I know that at one point there was a push for the user info files to be

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC Maintainer-Wanted Bugs/Cleaning]

2006-05-30 Thread Stefan Schweizer
Alec Warner wrote: So we created this awesome alias to put ebuilds that need a maintainer. Good idea at the time, decent idea still. The problem? We have nearly 2000 open bugs assigned to maintainer-wanted[1]. I would like to discuss policy on these. Do we keep them, do we get a group of

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 27 Proposal - Feedback Requested

2006-05-30 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:14:01AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote: Hello Mike, Am Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 05:29 schrieb Mike Kelly: I'm Mike Kelly, one of the SoC-ers. I'll be working on GLEP 27 for the summer. Right now I'm looking for some basic feedback on my proposal. In particular, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC Maintainer-Wanted Bugs/Cleaning]

2006-05-30 Thread Chris Bainbridge
On 30/05/06, Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Basically, it would be something that allowed you to browse the current tree of submitted ebuilds. This way users that submit something can categorize it for devs to easily look for ebuilds they may be interested in, and we can make it so we

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC Maintainer-Wanted Bugs/Cleaning]

2006-05-30 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 07:30:25PM -0400, Alec Warner wrote: So we created this awesome alias to put ebuilds that need a maintainer. Good idea at the time, decent idea still. The problem? We have nearly 2000 open bugs assigned to maintainer-wanted[1]. I would like to discuss policy on

[gentoo-dev] New adresses

2006-05-30 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
Hi, My new IM (Jabber) adress is : [EMAIL PROTECTED] My new email is : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Beber -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC Maintainer-Wanted Bugs/Cleaning]

2006-05-30 Thread Jakub Moc
Robin H. Johnson wrote: Could we establish policies for closing them or leaving them to sit open? - Upstream dead, previously submitted URLs no longer functional (yes, there are actually some like this!). - No ebuild included. - Upstream says obsolete in favour of another package. - Dev

[gentoo-dev] mii-tool single distribution

2006-05-30 Thread Enrico Weigelt
Hi folks, JFYI: I've made an mii-tool single distribution, which is independent from the rest of the net-tools stuff. http://www.metux.de/articles/oss/mii-tool-1_9_1_1 This is especially interesting for embedded systems with plenty of space. cu --

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 27 Proposal - Feedback Requested

2006-05-30 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 29 May 2006 23:29, Mike Kelly wrote: In particular, I know that at one point there was a push for the user info files to be XML not really, it was just an idea i had at the time ... ive been over it a few times since with the portage guys and it makes no real sense to do it in xml

Re: [gentoo-dev] New adresses

2006-05-30 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 12:12, Bertrand Jacquin wrote: Hi, My new IM (Jabber) adress is : [EMAIL PROTECTED] My new email is : [EMAIL PROTECTED] So now the whole world knows the email adresses of your contacts. They'll certainly be happy about that. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-embedded] mii-tool single distribution

2006-05-30 Thread Ned Ludd
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 14:05 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 13:06 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: Hi folks, JFYI: I've made an mii-tool single distribution, which is independent from the rest of the net-tools stuff. http://www.metux.de/articles/oss/mii-tool-1_9_1_1

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www/awstats: security issues, revbump (and probably maintainer) needed

2006-05-30 Thread Stefan Cornelius
CHTEKK does this one, thanks. Hi Gang, net-www/awstats is masked because it has open security issues (including remote code execution), see bug #130487 for details. Version 6.6 was made to fix it, but unfortunately this version is not working at all (see bug #134296), so we are trapped

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC Maintainer-Wanted Bugs/Cleaning]

2006-05-30 Thread Grant Goodyear
Mark Loeser wrote: Basically, it would be something that allowed you to browse the current tree of submitted ebuilds. This way users that submit something can categorize it for devs to easily look for ebuilds they may be interested in, and we can make it so we could easily grab the ebuilds

Re: [gentoo-dev] xextproto, what to do

2006-05-30 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: Hi, I am trying to install qemu and kqemu, and I run into a problem: This is a question for the gentoo-user mailing list. -- Andrew Gaffneyhttp://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ Gentoo Linux Developer

[gentoo-dev] xextproto, what to do

2006-05-30 Thread Rakotomandimby Mihamina
Hi, I am trying to install qemu and kqemu, and I run into a problem: localhost ~ # emerge qemu kqemu Calculating dependencies... done! Emerging (1 of 33) x11-proto/xextproto-7.0.2 to / Downloading http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/proto/xextproto- 7.0.2.tar.bz2 --01:34:16--

[gentoo-dev] New Developer: Chris Parrott

2006-05-30 Thread Mike Doty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All- Chris has move from various AT projects to a developer. cparrot was fist on the amd64 AT project, then he moved on to other arches and some other hards. It's my great pleasure to have him as a gentoo developer. In his own words: Greetings!

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Chris Parrott

2006-05-30 Thread Luis Medinas
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 11:16 -0500, Mike Doty wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All- Chris has move from various AT projects to a developer. cparrot was fist on the amd64 AT project, then he moved on to other arches and some other hards. It's my great pleasure to have

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Chris Parrott

2006-05-30 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
Mike Doty wrote: I am looking forward to working with all of you and getting to know you better. Anytime you want to chat about something, please feel free to ping me on IRC or drop me an email. I would like to welcome you to the team too, I remember when you first joined as an AT and it is

[gentoo-dev] [Last Rites ipkg-utils]

2006-05-30 Thread Alec Warner
ipkg-utils was maintained by tigger who is no longer a dev. As far as tigger/solar are aware there is no reason to keep it in the tree. It will be pmask'd and punted in 30 days at their request. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] mii-tool single distribution

2006-05-30 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:06:33PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: Hi folks, JFYI: I've made an mii-tool single distribution, which is independent from the rest of the net-tools stuff. http://www.metux.de/articles/oss/mii-tool-1_9_1_1 This is especially interesting for embedded systems with

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Chris Parrott

2006-05-30 Thread Homer Parker
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 11:16 -0500, Mike Doty wrote: Chris has move from various AT projects to a developer. cparrot was fist on the amd64 AT project, then he moved on to other arches and some other hards. It's my great pleasure to have him as a gentoo developer. /me sheds a tear..

Re: [gentoo-dev] xextproto, what to do

2006-05-30 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Andrew Gaffney wrote: Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: Hi, I am trying to install qemu and kqemu, and I run into a problem: This is a question for the gentoo-user mailing list. Didn't you notice, he cross-posted to there as well as personally emailing me. Not something likely to make anybody

[gentoo-dev] [useflag] v4l2 : video4linux2 support

2006-05-30 Thread Luca Barbato
Currently we have already 5 applications supporting v4l2 (6 if I split the support in ffmpeg) what about having it global too? local use flags (searching: v4l2) [+ C ] v4l2 (dev-libs/DirectFB): Enables video4linux2 support [+ C ]

[gentoo-dev] [useflag] firefox : build against firefox instead of mozilla

2006-05-30 Thread Jakub Moc
While at it: 16 apps w/ firefox local use flag: local use flags (searching: firefox) [+ C ] firefox (app-office/openoffice): Build against Firefox instead of Mozilla [+ C ] firefox (dev-haskell/gtk2hs): Build the Mozilla Embeded

Re: [gentoo-dev] [useflag] v4l2 : video4linux2 support

2006-05-30 Thread Luca Barbato
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:57:19PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: Currently we have already 5 applications supporting v4l2 (6 if I split the support in ffmpeg) Any reason why we can not use the existing 'v4l' use flag for version 2 as well? Why repeat the gtk/gtk2

Re: [gentoo-dev] [useflag] v4l2 : video4linux2 support

2006-05-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 23:41, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: Any reason why we can not use the existing 'v4l' use flag for version 2 as well? Why repeat the gtk/gtk2 mistake? Because v4l2 is not available on 2.4 kernel, and if transcode didn't have v4l2 instead of v4l I should have resurrected