After talking to Benedikt the last week, we decided to move our external
repository back onto lark (that's svn.gentoo.org/cvs.gentoo.org).
Furthermore, we'd like to continue where we stopped with the external
repository, thus the repository on lark is getting deleted and restored from
the
Rémi Cardona wrote:
Josh Saddler a écrit :
Ryan Hill wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Submit your ideas here, so we can discuss them. I will be choosing one
idea that we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of
Council-driven projects.
How far was Curtis from finishing www-redesign?
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Submit your ideas here, so we can discuss them. I will be choosing one
idea that we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of
Council-driven projects.
A simple QA review of the entire portage tree, fixing any trivial QA concern
like missing headers inclusion,
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:48:14 +0100 sanchan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Chris Gianelloni wrote:
| Submit your ideas here, so we can discuss them. I will be choosing
| one idea that we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of
| Council-driven projects.
|
| A simple QA review of the entire
Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto:
And ultimately, it's a waste of QA's time. There are far more severe
breakages and there are not many people in QA.
That's why I proposed this for a small targeted project.
--
Sandro (sanchan)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
sanchan wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto:
And ultimately, it's a waste of QA's time. There are far more severe
breakages and there are not many people in QA.
That's why I proposed this for a small targeted project.
It was my interpretation that the benefit of a council driven non-tree
Josh Saddler wrote:
*shrug* Why would it need to? The Gentoo site, as it is now, is a
helluva lot more usable and prettier than anything in the redesign ever
was, in my opinion.
Do you really think that the huge collection of links all over the top
and left is something anyone would call
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 15:52:54 -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
Rémi Cardona wrote:
About that bug, has anyone filed anything for it in Gentoo or is it the
kind of bug that creeps up anywhere and can look like something else is
responsible for it?
Now that the problem is understood, it can be
While hanging around lca07 it was mentioned how bandwidth hungry Gentoo is.
Given a lot of the world is still on dialup this could increase the potential
userbase for Gentoo.
As such the project idea is Automated Xdelta Generation.
principles:
no manual generation of xdeltas by gentoo devs
Quoting Hendrik Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would strongly advise against considering 2.6.19 stable
until this bug has been fixed.
From the Changelog of 2.6.19.2
commit 54e25b0460e6b1100e7ef9c0ac801bdce83921c0
Author: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Dec 29 10:00:58 2006 -0800
10 matches
Mail list logo
