[gentoo-dev] Re: [QA] RESTRICT clean up
On Sunday 01 of July 2007 01:35:58 Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: 2) clean up: we want to do global tree clean up after 1) is resolved, nofoo - foo, rest of the invalid values die. This is being done NOW. btw. note that RESTRICT=debug? ( strip ) doesn't make sense. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-admin/nologin, app-office/facturalux, x11-themes/jimmac-xcursors
Hola Raúl, Nosaltres fem servir facturalux+gentoo aquí a la feina, pero obviament no la versió del portage que està totalment obsoleta. Si fessim lesforç de refer el ebuild, mantindries el paquet viu? Saluts, Victor 2007/7/1, Raúl Porcel [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 # Raúl Porcel armin76 at gentoo dot org (01 Jul 2007) # For treecleaners # Pending removal in 60 days, 01 Sep 2007 # app-admin/nologin - bug 182215 # app-office/facturalux - bug 119971 # x11-themes/jimmac-xcursors - bug 182216 app-admin/nologin app-office/facturalux x11-themes/jimmac-xcursors -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGh+q+uQc30/atMkARAvzhAKCi34GXK3wKT+SdULvtI0zxZLtxBQCfXSHT mduO1nXPbh99MoFquM/k+WY= =z/Ey -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-admin/nologin, app-office/facturalux, x11-themes/jimmac-xcursors
Victor Barba napsal(a): Hola Raúl, Nosaltres fem servir facturalux+gentoo aquí a la feina, pero obviament no la versió del portage que està totalment obsoleta. Si fessim lesforç de refer el ebuild, mantindries el paquet viu? Saluts, Victor ??? English only, please. -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] cyclic dependency
Hi. How can one avoid cyclic dependencies in custom ebuilds? eg. soft1.ebuild DEPENDs on soft2 but soft2.ebuild also DEPENDs on soft1 (both packages are required; none of the two works alone so it wouldn't make sense to install just one) Is there a function that can be used to check whether a certain package+version has already been emerged? Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: cyclic dependency
Vieri Di Paola [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is there a function that can be used to check whether a certain package+version has already been emerged? has_version, but in what way do they depend on each other? Is a PDEPEND possible? V-Li -- http://www.gentoo.org/ http://www.faulhammer.org/ http://www.gnupg.org/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Last rite: media-sound/bitscope
# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (02 Jul 2007) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Replaced by media-sound/bitmeter. media-sound/bitscope -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: cyclic dependency
--- Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vieri Di Paola [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is there a function that can be used to check whether a certain package+version has already been emerged? has_version, but in what way do they depend on each other? Is a PDEPEND possible? I'm not an experienced ebuild scripter. I only knew of RDEPEND and DEPEND. Now I'm reading this on PDEPEND: http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/dependencies/index.html The two software packages depend at run-time. I'll try PDEPEND. Thank you. Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games. http://sims.yahoo.com/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: cyclic dependency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vieri Di Paola wrote: The two software packages depend at run-time. then they can simply RDEPEND on eachother. The package manager should do the right thing. Questions like this one are best asked in #gentoo-dev-help IRC channel, Marijn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGiSRLp/VmCx0OL2wRAjMrAJ9l1l5O4kV3a68LjLin/wbFj3g/pQCfTUTf d/DVeP4aI3/cVlukcD10gOg= =SbnS -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Inotify and (f)crontabs
Hi!
Ryan Reich wrote:
On 7/1/07, Daniel Schömer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ sudo fcrontab -l systab
[...]
%hourly 0-30 run-parts --report /etc/cron.hourly
%daily * * run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily
[...]
Thanks for sharing this. [...] This is a more elegant solution
than the run-crons method, though it doesn't have quite the
same effect as instructing cron to actually run each command
separately (their outputs will be mailed in conglomerate,
rather than one mail per periodic program. This is, according
to your preferences, either a bug or a feature.
I have never really thought about the combined mails. I'm using
this on my desktop with only a few scripts in
/etc/cron.{h,d,w,m}*/. Thinking about it now, I would prefer one
mail per script. At least when there are more than just a few
scripts run by cron.
I can't see an elegant way implementing this directly in fcron.
A modified version of run-parts that's capable of mailing the
output of each script (or all in conglomerate if specified) to
the runnig user (or a specified account) may do.
Less ambiguously a bug, though, is that the syslog will only
record running run-parts and not which parts were run).
Would it be sufficient to let this also be done by run-parts?
Then there would be records of fcron starting run-parts and
records of run-parts starting each script.
Have you any thoughts on what to do with check_system_crontabs?
Its schedule is inherently reactive and not periodic, so
really, administering it with (f)cron at all is a logical
error. That's why I suggested inotify in the first place.
I must say, I can't remember that I've seen check_system_crontabs
on my desktop; maybe I just suppressed it :-). Now that I think
of it, I'm remembering an elog message from the fcron ebuild
telling me to use the fcrontab systab for system-wide jobs
instead of /etc/{f,}crontab.
Using inotify sounds more logical for me than using (f)cron for
this.
Daniel Schömer
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emacs/ognus
# Ulrich Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] (02 Jul 2007) # Gnus alpha branch, obsolete since 2003. Last release was ognus-0.24 # which was replaced by the identical gnus-5.10.1. # Masked for removal in 30 days. app-emacs/ognus -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Last rite: media-libs/allegromp3
# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (02 Jul 2007) # Orphaned library. Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 153439. media-libs/allegromp3 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: cyclic dependency
--- Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vieri Di Paola wrote: The two software packages depend at run-time. then they can simply RDEPEND on eachother. The package manager should do the right thing. No, it reports a cyclic dependency. Questions like this one are best asked in #gentoo-dev-help IRC channel, I currently don't have an IRC client and am not really used to using them, especially without X. Anyway, I guess I'll end up connecting some day. Thanks for your time. Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Last rite: x11-misc/ntodo
# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (02 Jul 2007) # Upstream gone, last release from 2004. Still using GTK+-1.2. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Use x11-misc/gtodo instead. x11-misc/ntodo -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Last rite: x11-misc/gcolor
# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (02 Jul 2007) # Still using GTK+-1.2. Replaced by x11-misc/gcolor2. # Masked for removal in 30 days. x11-misc/gcolor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08
Let me paste last year's mail: | well it's about that time of the year ... time for nominating people | for the next Gentoo Council | | for the quick low down: | - nominations are from July 1 through July 31 | - anyone can nominate | - only Gentoo devs may be nominated | | so get with the nominating people ! | | for the full details, check out the Council homepage: | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/#doc_chap6 Have fun and good luck :) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08
Let me nominate the current council members: Mike Doty kingtaco Danny van Dyk kugelfang Roy Marplesuberlord Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen jaervosz Robin H. Johnson robbat2 Mike Frysinger vapier Chris Gianelloni wolf31o2 Say YES or NO. -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08
A good time for a fresh wind in the Gentoo world :) nominating: betelgeuse dberkholz jokey Best regards, Stefan -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08
I nominate... Uberlord tomk taviso kthx. (And no, I don't think there's a reason why they're all brits) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08
nominating: welp taviso others are nominated already ;) -Jokey -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Last rite: x11-misc/gclipper
# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (02 Jul 2007) # Replaced by glipper, klipper, xclipboard or xfce4-clipman. # Upstream has no HOMEPAGE anymore. Still using GTK+-1.2. # Masked for removal in 30 days. x11-misc/gclipper -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08
Markus Ullmann schrieb: nominating: others are nominated already ;) d'oh, forgot fellow dertobi123 -Jokey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08
Thorsten Veller wrote: Let me nominate the current council members: Mike Doty kingtaco Danny van Dyk kugelfang Roy Marplesuberlord Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen jaervosz Robin H. Johnson robbat2 Mike Frysinger vapier Chris Gianelloni wolf31o2 Say YES or NO. Thanks for the nomination, but I'm not interested in another year on the council. --taco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08
Stefan Schweizer kirjoitti: A good time for a fresh wind in the Gentoo world :) nominating: betelgeuse \o/ Yea. Somebody likes me or maybe it's just a clever plot done by the people pulling the strings? I want to be absolutely corrupted, so I accept. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -jokey - -welp - -genstef - -betelgeuse - -tove - -uberlord -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGiW4quQc30/atMkARAn9RAKCRvkzlTNxfG3SxeognVlgeecPX9QCgvWsa hKi03zAYkJRYRtA+6g1Usts= =yYCL -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08
I vote for these brave devs: jokey betelgeuse vapier wolf31o2 genstef dberkholz nightmorph Bye, -- Davide Cendron Gentoo Documentation Project Italian Follow Up Translator http://www.gentoo.org/doc/it/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08
Davide Cendron kirjoitti: I vote for these brave devs: Votes happen next month :) You can nominate if you want of course. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08
Il Tuesday 03 July 2007 00:32:08 Davide Cendron ha scritto: I vote for these brave devs: jokey betelgeuse vapier wolf31o2 genstef dberkholz nightmorph Bye, Oooppsss... s/vote for/nominate 8) -- Davide Cendron Gentoo Documentation Project Italian Follow Up Translator http://www.gentoo.org/doc/it/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:10:03PM +0200, Torsten Veller wrote: Robin H. Johnson robbat2 No, unfortunately I don't have time to run again. My job has required ever-increasing amounts of my time. Even my commit stats show just how much I'm being pressured lately. Of the tree signing stuff that I originally ran to work on, here's the CVS space I was working on it. http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/users/robbat2/tree-signing-gleps/ A short status report on it: 00 - summary, and review of past attempts - needs techreview + copyedit, but completed. 04 - Manifest2 hashes - I believe that the Portage codebase has moved on, more might work. 01 - Distribution process security - needs content polishing and review. 02 - Developer security - lots of work here, this part will probably never happen. Probably should just drop. 03 - GnuPG Policies - nothing done yet, but this is mainly a summary of some of the list posts from last year. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer Council Member E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 pgpBB58zykDzN.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: cyclic dependency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Hill wrote: Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: Vieri Di Paola wrote: The two software packages depend at run-time. then they can simply RDEPEND on eachother. The package manager should do the right thing. It doesn't. See freetype which requires =fontconfig-2.3 at runtime which in turn requires freetype at runtime. Bug #179736. I think the problem is that fontconfig has freetype not just in RDEPEND but also DEPEND (see how in the emerge error output one dep is reported as medium and the other as hard). Which is interpreted as 'needed at build time in working state, thus with all its RDEPENDs (which includes satisfied', creating the circular deps. So, just RDEPEND on each other should be fine (at least in recent portage, I think older ones treated RDEPEND and DEPEND the same). But if one package has DEPEND, the other one needs PDEPEND. P.S. I think the solution with PDEPEND is wrong for bug 179736. If I understand it correctly, then freetype-2.2 doesn't NEED =fontconfig-2.4, but, if installed, will crash older versions. Then there should be a blocker on fontconfig-2.4 in freetype. I think portage handles that correctly since some point. And if not, it should :) - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGiaA2tbrAj05h3oQRAuyAAJ4nu6QcexxRQkQEpg98pXGn09Ry+gCfVDtk H3ENhWchaop/RzVBH8kNQoI= =Ad8b -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08
* Raúl Porcel [EMAIL PROTECTED]: - -tove No, thanks. Not my job. -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
