Hi there
Sorry for the delay but I was busy organizing our booth at the OpenExpo in
Bern.
You can find the updated GLEP46 here:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep-0046.txt
Difference in words
---
Restriction to http/https has been dropped as pointed out by council members
(amne
On Monday 24 March 2008 22:03:48 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> we're going to need to extend the syntax anyways to allow for
> per-version-per-module arguments. unless openrc does that now ... Roy ?
It now supports per module per kernel version arguments.
Thanks
Roy
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org ma
From yesterday:
PROMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 3.2.9 2001/08/21 20:14
<4>Linux version 2.4.31 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.6
(Gentoo Linux 3.3.6)) #4 Sun Jul 17 13:51:21 MDT 2005
<4>ARCH: SUN4U
Linux version 2.4.31 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.6 (Gentoo
Linux 3.3.6)) #4 Sun Ju
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Monday 24 March 2008 22:03:48 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > we're going to need to extend the syntax anyways to allow for
> > per-version-per-module arguments. unless openrc does that now ... Roy ?
>
> It now supports per module per kernel version argu
On Monday 24 March 2008, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 24 March 2008, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> >> /etc/modules.autoload.d has always allowed module parameters to appear
> >> after the module name.
> >>
> >> /etc/conf.d/modules has allowed a completely different syntax r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
René 'Necoro' Neumann schrieb:
| Hi,
|
| Christian Faulhammer schrieb:
| | We have a prior version for some time now in the Emacs overlay for two
| | live ebuilds...so we go and merge your changed (ulm already did), test
| | it and report any problem
On 21-03-2008 12:07:24 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Friday 21 March 2008 10:37:11 Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > Assuming you would use libkvm, on Darwin this means as unprivileged user
> > (not using suid) you can't see any processes at all.
>
> That's different from FreeBSD and NetBSD then.
Indeed
Hi,
René 'Necoro' Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I guess this fix will make it into bzr-1.4. Should the eclass then
> depend on this version or should it still not allow the lp:-scheme?
This eclass is still experimental...but I am all for raising the
version requirement and allow as much feature
Raúl Porcel wrote:
From yesterday:
PROMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 3.2.9 2001/08/21 20:14
<4>Linux version 2.4.31 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.6
(Gentoo Linux 3.3.6)) #4 Sun Jul 17 13:51:21 MDT 2005
<4>ARCH: SUN4U
Linux version 2.4.31 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.6
(Gentoo Lin
