[gentoo-dev] mpg123, mpg321 a new-style virtual/mpg123 (move from PROVIDE like)

2008-05-17 Thread Samuli Suominen
Upgraded the virtual to new-style. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] why not player/stage/gazebo

2008-05-17 Thread Zhu Sha Zang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok, show me the path to be a gentoo's developer. Maybe i can do it now. thanks for answers. Michel Filipe escreveu: Hello Zhu! Is a good time to most contribute with Gentoo. :D Ioannis Aslanidis escreveu: They probably aren't in the tree

Re: [gentoo-dev] why not player/stage/gazebo

2008-05-17 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Zhu Sha Zang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Ok, show me the path to be a gentoo's developer. Maybe i can do it now. 1. Pick up a part of Gentoo that you'd like to work on (clearly robotics packages in this case). 2. Work on it (fix bugs, add features, document,

Re: [gentoo-dev] why not player/stage/gazebo

2008-05-17 Thread Sébastien Fabbro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Zhu Sha Zang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Ok, show me the path to be a gentoo's developer. Maybe i can do it now. 0. Participate in improving the player [1], stage [2], and gazebo [3] ebuilds. [1]

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage

2008-05-17 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Mart Raudsepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: big_snip / IMHO, lzma is far from being mature enough from being suited as packaging format for production systems. And actually, I don't see the benefit over well-approved tar+(gz|bz2). So my vote is to NOT use it for gentoo source packages. cu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Moving some packages around

2008-05-17 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Mon, 12 May 2008, Ryan Hill wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote: - bison and flex should get out of the system package set, what clearer than moving them out of sys-*? They are not so commonly used so there should no compelling reason to have them installed on