[gentoo-dev] mpg123, mpg321 a new-style virtual/mpg123 (move from PROVIDE like)

2008-05-17 Thread Samuli Suominen 
Upgraded the virtual to new-style.
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] why not player/stage/gazebo

2008-05-17 Thread Zhu Sha Zang 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ok, show me the path to be a gentoo's developer.

Maybe i can do it now.

thanks for answers.
Michel Filipe escreveu:
 Hello Zhu! Is a good time to most contribute with Gentoo. :D
 
 Ioannis Aslanidis escreveu:
  They probably aren't in the tree because nobody asked for them to be
  in the tree. Please, be so kind to open an enhancement request at
  http://bugs.gentoo.org and provide a working ebuild if possible.

  On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Zhu Sha Zang 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Someone can speak to me why this programs aren't in portage tree, cos
 they are a good programs to robotic area? I finded only this packages in
 overlay, but so old. If i wish to put this sources in portage what i
 need to do?


 thanks!
 __
 Faça ligações para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
 http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/
 -- 
 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
 
 
 


- --
Zhu Sha Zang
Hyaku ne hayanda yo!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkguoEgACgkQbLyL8mxGP9QCvACeM5U68qSdYHvZbpN9tLo8l+ux
MvEAnRi+kTswyOHU/R6gfaQIa/DFEIji
=ROJ3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
__
Fa�a liga��es para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger 
http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/ 
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] why not player/stage/gazebo

2008-05-17 Thread Arun Raghavan 
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Zhu Sha Zang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 Ok, show me the path to be a gentoo's developer.

 Maybe i can do it now.

1. Pick up a part of Gentoo that you'd like to work on (clearly
robotics packages in this case).
2. Work on it (fix bugs, add features, document, and so on -- more
information at http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/?catid=gentoodev and
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/)
3. Once you have established your interest and ability to help, find a mentor
4. Your mentor will guide you through the recruitment process

Regards,
-- 
Arun Raghavan
(http://nemesis.accosted.net)
v2sw5Chw4+5ln4pr6$OFck2ma4+9u8w3+1!m?l7+9GSCKi056
e6+9i4b8/9HTAen4+5g4/8APa2Xs8r1/2p5-8 hackerkey.com
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] why not player/stage/gazebo

2008-05-17 Thread Sébastien Fabbro 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

 On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Zhu Sha Zang
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip
  Ok, show me the path to be a gentoo's developer.
 
  Maybe i can do it now.

0. Participate in improving the player [1], stage [2], and gazebo [3]
ebuilds.

[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26373
[2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185298
[3] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185470

Sébastien
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkgutW0ACgkQ1ycZbhPLE2ABHgCbBfAx4QiGaM4YIa03DCshLUg9
E2IAnjO6pltg+hv+JXjoe2GkoTROrWMl
=ifox
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
���^�X�����(��j)b�b�

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage

2008-05-17 Thread Enrico Weigelt 
* Mart Raudsepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:

big_snip /

IMHO, lzma is far from being mature enough from being suited as 
packaging format for production systems. And actually, I don't 
see the benefit over well-approved tar+(gz|bz2). 

So my vote is to NOT use it for gentoo source packages.


cu
-- 
-
 Enrico Weigelt==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
-
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Moving some packages around

2008-05-17 Thread Ulrich Mueller 
 On Mon, 12 May 2008, Ryan Hill wrote:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote:

 - bison and flex should get out of the system package set, what
 clearer than moving them out of sys-*? They are not so commonly
 used so there should no compelling reason to have them installed on
 every system;

 both are required to build our toolchain.

A Lexical Analyser and a Parser Generator are also required by
IEEE Std 1003.1 (aka POSIX) as part of the C-Language Development
Utilities.

So it doesn't make much sense to remove flex and bison from system.

Ulrich
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list