[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2008-05-18 23h59 UTC

2008-05-18 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2008-05-18 23h59 UTC. Removals: profiles/selinux/alpha 2008-05-13 01:54:13 pebenito profiles/selinux/sparc 2008-05-13 01:54:20 pebenito media-video/fr

Re: [gentoo-dev] why not player/stage/gazebo

2008-05-18 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 06:33:15PM -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Someone can speak to me why this programs aren't in portage tree, cos > they are a good programs to robotic area? I finded only this packages in > overlay, but so old. If i wish to p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new 'virtualization' project or herd

2008-05-18 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Friday, 16. May 2008, Tiziano Müller wrote: > Mike Auty wrote: > > As one of the primary vmware devs, I'm not sure that vmware easily > > fits into this group based on it's closed-source nature, and the > > complex (but just about workable) module system we've put in place. I > > also wouldn't

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask

2008-05-18 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 18/05/2008 в 15:14 +, Samuli Suominen (drac) пишет: > drac08/05/18 15:14:30 > > Modified: package.mask > Log: > dxr3player removed > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.8634 profiles/package.mask Could you add ChangeLog entries for thing like this,

[gentoo-dev] Re: Moving some packages around

2008-05-18 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 18 May 2008, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: >> A Lexical Analyser and a Parser Generator are also required by >> IEEE Std 1003.1 (aka POSIX) as part of the C-Language Development >> Utilities. > IIRC POSIX mandates vi too, and we don't have that in system. No, it's optional ("Use

[gentoo-dev] Re: Moving some packages around

2008-05-18 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Ulrich Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A Lexical Analyser and a Parser Generator are also required by > IEEE Std 1003.1 (aka POSIX) as part of the C-Language Development > Utilities. > > So it doesn't make much sense to remove flex and bison from system. IIRC POSIX mandates vi too, and we d