Marius Mauch a écrit :
So, do you think it should be enabled by default?
Does portage have a way to report which libraries it is keeping around
because of preserve-libs ? If there's an easy way to figure that out,
then enabling it by default is a very sane and sound idea.
Cheers,
Rémi
--
On 29-05-2008 08:54:48 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Marius Mauch a écrit :
So, do you think it should be enabled by default?
Does portage have a way to report which libraries it is keeping around
because of preserve-libs ? If there's an easy way to figure that out,
then enabling it by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
| The purpose of this is to keep the system operational after library
| upgrades until all affected packages could be rebuilt and to simplify
| the process, not to avoid the rebuilds.
I couldn't find it mentioned in your email,
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also it is not going to be a perfect solution against all runtime link
errors, but if enabled it should eliminate the need for revdep-rebuild
in most cases.
I'm afraid that it will turn, for complex libraries like libexpat and
users not using
2008-05-29 08:54:48 Rémi Cardona napisał(a):
Does portage have a way to report which libraries it is keeping around
because of preserve-libs ?
portageq list_preserved_libs /
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thu, 29 May 2008 09:28:16 +0100
Mike Auty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
| The purpose of this is to keep the system operational after library
| upgrades until all affected packages could be rebuilt and to
| simplify the
Hi people,
All python_mod_* functions are now ROOT aware. I've also modified them
to die if they aren't run in expected phases. Also I plan to make byte
compiling functions print a warning when *.py{c,o} are installed under
/usr/share which is a FHS violation.
The tree and python developer's
Ali Polatel yazmış:
Mart Raudsepp yazmış:
On L, 2008-05-24 at 10:18 +0300, Ali Polatel wrote:
Arun Raghavan yazmış:
Greetings All,
Hey there
I've been working on an ancient bug [1] requesting a split of the
gnome-python, gnome-python-extras, and gnome-python-desktop
On Thu, 29 May 2008 11:02:55 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote:
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As much as we want preserve-libs to be an all-curing magic, it's
not. When you need to replace a library you need to do so _for all its
users at once_, if you allow
