Re: [gentoo-dev] Jeeves IRC replacement now alive - Willikins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 02:18:05PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Hi folks, Getting the bot out there - If you would like to have the new bot in your #gentoo-* channel, would each channel founder/leader please respond to this thread, stating the channel name, and that they are the contact for any problems/troubles. #gentoo-accessibility Thanks, - --- William Hubbs gentoo accessibility team lead [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkib7y4ACgkQblQW9DDEZTibGACgq+9ZezFKXgD8fXwOuJjMjUuY RncAnjVfW80RIrkDDlasu5kXi5gA/siY =HWBl -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] New developer : Thomas Anderson (gentoofan23)
* Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080808 03:13]: On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 23:43:32 +0200 Denis Dupeyron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's my pleasure to introduce Thomas Anderson (gentoofan23) as an It seems that you've been living two lives. One life, you're Thomas A. Anderson, program writer for a respectable software company. You have a social security number, pay your taxes, and you... help your landlady carry out her garbage. The other life is lived in computers, where you go by the hacker alias Neo and are guilty of virtually every computer crime we have a law for. One of these lives has a future, and one of them does not. Hopefully it's the second one ... -- Michael Hammer|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Graz, AT Gentoo Developer (Kerberos) | http://www.michael-hammer.at pgpnzAj2gvvGp.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Final removal of php-4*
Heya, it's August 8th, which is the date of official discontinuation of any work on php-4 (even security-related) on upstream-side [1] [2]. On gentoo, =dev-lang/php-4* has already been masked for security reasons since Oct 19th 2007, along with everything which depends on it. Removal from our tree was initially announced for Jan 1st 2008, but we decided to postpone it until today to give users even more time to migrate. That means, I'm going to remove all php-4-related things today: * dev-php4/ (will be done by infra) * dev-lang/php/php-4* Basically: Everything explicitly listed in package.mask because of php-4. Also, several adjustments to ebuilds, which are still referring to dev-php4/* names (e.g. because of blocks or || ( a b ) deps), will be made by me today. If you (or your company) have still not upgraded (you probably should not run such a setup anyway, at least if it's publicly accessible), you might be interested in the yet to be created php4 overlay [3], which will be accessible using layman once it is available. As always, feel free to contact the php team by mail [4] or IRC (Freenode / #gentoo-php). [1] http://www.php.net/archive/2007.php [2] http://www.php.net/archive/2008.php#id2008-08-07-1 [3] http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/php/browser [4] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Christian Hoffmann signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Theodora FETSI/GR01/BCN/U/MSF is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 2008-08-01 and will not return until 2008-08-25. I will be on vacation from 1/08/08 to 22/8/08. back in the office on 25/08/08.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Jeeves IRC replacement now alive - Willikins
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 02:18:05PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Getting the bot out there - If you would like to have the new bot in your #gentoo-* channel, would each channel founder/leader please respond to this thread, stating the channel name, and that they are the contact for any problems/troubles. I'm certainly not a founder nor a leader, but I think I speak for all of us in the amd64 team that we would like a bot to tell us about bugs. so: #gentoo-amd64-dev #gentoo-amd64 Thanks. pgpccMBtrkBYb.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for August 7
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Stephen Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev list to see. I would like to put forward the following suggestion for the Council's consideration: While the current state of PMS is not perfect, it is a reasonably close approximation to existing and historical behaviour of EAPI 0. Given this, and that getting a perfect definition is not feasible on a timescale shorter than several years, it should be treated as a draft standard, and any deviations from it found in the gentoo tree or package managers should have a bug filed against either the deviator or PMS to resolve the differences. [...] Is there some reason why this needs to be stated explicity (eg. are you having difficulty getting things fixed in the tree?) Currently it can't be referenced from other official documentation. There's already one GLEP which had to get references to PMS removed because of this. And it will become a bigger problem when we have more EAPIs and we can't rely on any spec except short summaries posted to @dev-announce. Regards, -- Santiago M. Mola Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
