[gentoo-dev] New eclass proposal: auto-export

2009-04-22 Thread Petteri Räty
Here's an eclass proposal to wrap EXPORT_FUNCTIONS with auto detection of functions. This way all eclasses don't have to duplicate the EAPI detection code. If people find this useful, I will document it properly with eclass-manpages etc. Regards, Petteri # Copyright 1999-2009 Gentoo Foundation #

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass proposal: auto-export

2009-04-22 Thread Petteri Räty
Petteri Räty wrote: Here's an eclass proposal to wrap EXPORT_FUNCTIONS with auto detection of functions. This way all eclasses don't have to duplicate the EAPI detection code. If people find this useful, I will document it properly with eclass-manpages etc. Regards, Petteri No need to

Re: [gentoo-dev] PKG-INFO (Was: PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready)

2009-04-22 Thread Petteri Räty
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Still trying to stick to one subthread per item here. On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:27:41 +0300 Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: * PKG-INFO query. I have probably missed what's the use case for non installed packages? For some packages, when a bug report for a

Re: [gentoo-dev] PKG-INFO (Was: PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready)

2009-04-22 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:56:08 +0300 Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: Ok. So people should then be using has_version in pkg_info if they want to detect if it's installed or not? If they absolutely totally need to detect that, then yes. Generally pkg_info should just try to display as

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass proposal: auto-export

2009-04-22 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 16:35 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: Here's an eclass proposal to wrap EXPORT_FUNCTIONS with auto detection of functions. This way all eclasses don't have to duplicate the EAPI detection code. If people find this useful, I will document it properly with eclass-manpages etc.

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass proposal: auto-export

2009-04-22 Thread Petteri Räty
Arun Raghavan wrote: On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 16:35 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: Here's an eclass proposal to wrap EXPORT_FUNCTIONS with auto detection of functions. This way all eclasses don't have to duplicate the EAPI detection code. If people find this useful, I will document it properly with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2009-04-19 23h59 UTC

2009-04-22 Thread James Cloos

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-im/tapiocad, net-im/tapioca-xmpp, net-im/tapiocaui

2009-04-22 Thread Mounir Lamouri
# Mounir Lamouri volk...@gentoo.org (22 Apr 2009) # Masked for removal in 60 days. See bug 248008. # Tapioca is unmaintained and they are officially abandoned subprojects. # In addition, tapioca-xmpp has been superseeded by telepathy-gabble. net-im/tapiocad net-im/tapioca-xmpp net-im/tapiocaui

Re: [gentoo-dev] PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready

2009-04-22 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: I've got the EAPI 3 branch for PMS more or less ready:    http://github.com/ciaranm/pms/tree/eapi-3 Here's the list: * PKG-PRETEND critical * SLOT-OPERATOR-DEPS critical * USE-DEP-DEFAULTS critical *

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo cluster liveCD

2009-04-22 Thread Tom Stellard
I am trying to build the Gentoo cluster live CD using the overlay from here: git://git.overlays.gentoo.org/proj/clustering-livecd.git I have run into some problems with some of the ebuilds in this overlay. Here is a patch to fix the beowulf-head ebuild. -Tom Stellard diff --git

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo cluster liveCD

2009-04-22 Thread Tom Stellard
Here is another patch to fix the livecdtools ebuild from the clustering-livecd overlay: git://git.overlays.gentoo.org/proj/clustering-livecd.git -Tom Stellard diff --git a/overlay/app-misc/livecd-tools/Manifest b/overlay/app-misc/livecd-tools/Manifest index dbbfa1b..5352ce8 100644 ---

Re: [gentoo-dev] PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready

2009-04-22 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 20:59 Sun 12 Apr , Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Hopefully we can get a final list decided upon and provisionally approved by the next Council meeting, and then as soon as Portage is ready to go we can merge everything into PMS proper and get a signed approval tag as we did for EAPI 2.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-04-22 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 20:47 Mon 16 Mar , Ryan Hill wrote: Whether it's enabled for EAPI 3 or not, I'd at least like to see 'test' added to FEATURES in targets/developer/make.defaults now. That should (hopefully) raise the visibility somewhat. I'm all for enabling it in the dev profile by default. --

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: does emerge verify arch compatibility when merging a binary package?

2009-04-22 Thread Amit Dor-Shifer
Following suggestion, I've written a paragraph about the xpak payload. I think it helps clear things. I think it can be added to the portage(5) manpage, but would be happy to hear other suggestions. BEGIN Binary packages A binary package is an image of a pre-built installation. The merging