[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emacs/cc-mode

2009-08-27 Thread Christian Faulhammer

# Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org (25 Aug 2009)
# Included with GNU Emacs (since version 21 at least).
# Last stand-alone release in 2006; cannot be compiled with Emacs 23.
# Masked for removal in 30 days, bug 282662.


Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode


Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] QA last rites for app-emulation/parallels-workstation

2009-08-27 Thread Diego E . Pettenò

# Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (27 Aug 2009)
#  on behalf of QA team
# Fails to patch, bug #214719, since March 2008.
# Package need a new maintainer, possibly someone actually
# using this stuff.
# Removal on 2009-10-26

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo stats server/client @ 2009-08-22

2009-08-27 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
 What's next
 Besides before-mentioned table the task
   Collect FEATURES variables in three sets (conf, defaults, globals),
   not merged
 is next on my list.


Previous test participants are welcome to re-submit as the data model
change has basically reset the data collected on the FEATURES variable.


Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009.0 profiles

2009-08-27 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Zac Medico wrote:
 With the introduction of autobuilds, would it be a good idea to rename
 the profiles so that they don't have the date association? This does
 seem to confuse a number of new users who will appear asking where the
 2009 profiles are.
 Maybe, but you could also look at this as a documentation/training

My vote is for getting rid of the date association, too.  The where is
2009 aspect also is a strong point to me.

Does sticking to dates have any real benefits?