Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2009, 17:57 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
Fabian Groffen wrote:
Point remains that it looks in-consistant, for repo, name is an
attribute, while for owner it is a sub-element. Why having attributes
in the first place anyway?
It's closer to the original
Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2009, 18:17 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Sure. Just periodically fetch the repository centrally. Have a master
list of sync URLs with expected repository names, and use that to
generate the full master list that includes metadata.
Added
On Thursday 01 October 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2009, 18:17 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Sure. Just periodically fetch the repository centrally. Have a
master list of sync URLs with expected repository names, and use
that to generate
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 04:01:29AM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Zac Medico wrote:
I propose support for license groups in ebuilds then, I guess.
That seems like a reasonable solution. So, an ebuild can do
something like LICENSE=@GPL-2+ and that will expand to whatever
the definition
Tiziano Müller wrote:
What if that metadata format changes later or is extended by
additional required entries?
How about using the power of xml and version the schemas? As long as the
metadata-file specifies the respective dtd/xsd/relaxng you know exactly
how to validate (and parse) it and
Tiziano Müller wrote:
A simple rule of thumb is: use attributes for values with predefined
contents, use elements otherwise. So, make name an element please.
Okay, let's give it a try.
Hi guys,
Could anyone write up a one-liner news item for the xorg-server 1.6
stabilization with there 2 upgrade guides :
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.6-upgrade-guide.xml
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/libxcb-1.4-upgrade-guide.xml
I tried figuring out
# Doesn't work with newer openal. Use games-action/openastromenace instead.
games-action/astromenace-bin
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:42:22 +0200
Rémi Cardona r...@gentoo.org wrote:
I tried figuring out how to write one myself, but failed miserably
because of the entirely non-intuitive GLEP.
Basically, all stable users should see that news item.
You're failing miserably because you're looking at it
Rémi Cardona wrote:
Hi guys,
Could anyone write up a one-liner news item for the xorg-server 1.6
stabilization with there 2 upgrade guides :
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.6-upgrade-guide.xml
10 matches
Mail list logo
