Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 09:08:14PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
A stable user who doesn't want python 3 installed shouldn't have it
forced on them. If something is pulling in python-3 then that
package needs to have its dependencies fixed. IIRC Portage isn't
greedy
Matti Bickel dixit (2010-03-08, 10:39):
A stable user who doesn't want python 3 installed shouldn't have it
forced on them. If something is pulling in python-3 then that
package needs to have its dependencies fixed. IIRC Portage isn't
greedy wrt. SLOTs like it was before (unless you use
Hello!
There are a few patterns for potentially low hanging fruits among Gentoo
bugs:
SRC_URI errors
Missing depencies
...
What else?
Anything you look after repeatedly that doesn't take days to get it fixed?
Sebastian
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:06:40 +0100
Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
There are a few patterns for potentially low hanging fruits among
Gentoo bugs:
SRC_URI errors
Missing depencies
(Sorry for answering a developer targeted question while I'm not one.)
- Minor version bumps
On Monday 08 March 2010 12:06:40 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Hello!
There are a few patterns for potentially low hanging fruits among Gentoo
bugs:
SRC_URI errors
Missing depencies
...
What else?
Anything you look after repeatedly that doesn't take days to get it
fixed?
mån 2010-03-08 klockan 10:53 +0100 skrev Antoni Grzymala:
Sorry guys if I missed something crucial in this lengthy thread, but
from what I'm understanding:
if python-3 goes stable (and unmasked):
- it is a separate, slotted version
- it generally shouldn't get pulled in (current portage
On 8.3.2010 16.23, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
AFAICS you are right (and that is also why I have a hard time
understanding the flames here, are people so against fixing the deps in
their packages and/or filing bugs and/or contacting devrel about those
maintainers who refuse to fix their
On Seg, 2010-03-08 at 11:06 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Hello!
There are a few patterns for potentially low hanging fruits among Gentoo
bugs:
SRC_URI errors
Missing depencies
...
What else?
Anything you look after repeatedly that doesn't take days to get it fixed?
Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org said:
Hello!
There are a few patterns for potentially low hanging fruits among Gentoo
bugs:
SRC_URI errors
Missing depencies
...
What else?
Anything you look after repeatedly that doesn't take days to get it fixed?
What is this even in
Hello,
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 16:52 +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
Hello
I have managed to split the desktop profile to gnome and kde submenus. The
result can be found in kde-crazy overlay (not in layman) [1]
I think this whole approach of adding yet more subprofiles is highly
suboptimal.
On 03/08/10 18:08, Mark Loeser wrote:
What is this even in reference to? Its not at all clear what you are
trying to do.
Okay, sorry.
I was wondering what classes of bugs there are that are
- reoccuring (therefore beloning to a class or pattern)
- relatively easy to fix
- ideally suited
On 03/08/10 14:27, Markos Chandras wrote:
Documentation installation
There are few packages that call missing documents on dodoc commands
any idea how to find all these bugs?
sebastian
On 03/08/10 14:13, Róbert Čerňanský wrote:
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:06:40 +0100
Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
There are a few patterns for potentially low hanging fruits among
Gentoo bugs:
SRC_URI errors
Missing depencies
(Sorry for answering a developer targeted question
On Monday 08 March 2010 05:06:40 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
There are a few patterns for potentially low hanging fruits among Gentoo
bugs:
work with the bugday guys to get this incorporated into their documentation
SRC_URI errors
Missing depencies
...
What else?
incorrect LICENSE /
On 04-03-2010 22:08:06 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
3. Remove
=
- Remove package dev-util/${PN} from CVS (as in [2])
cd dev-util
cvs rm -Rf ${PN}
cvs ci -m dev-util/${PN}: Remove (renamed to dev-vcs/${PN}) ${PN}
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:19:36PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
No, it won't. To prove it, I've just tested with a stable stage3
containing portage-2.1.7.x. Here are the steps:
1) extract stable stage3 and chroot into it
2) mkdir /etc/portage echo dev-lang/python ~*
mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:13 +0200 skrev Mart Raudsepp:
Instead I think we should be improving eselect profile to support
multiple inheriting /etc/make.profile files in a user friendly fashion,
and in the end removing 249 subprofiles, instead of adding 28+.
I vote for this one. A profile
Hehe,
http://dev.gentoo.org/~antarus/essays/mixin-profiles.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 antarus users 2653 Jun 4 2006 mixin-profiles.txt
-A
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Peter Hjalmarsson x...@rymdraket.net wrote:
mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:13 +0200 skrev Mart Raudsepp:
Instead I think we should be
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:13:30 +0100
Róbert Čerňanský hslis...@zoznam.sk wrote:
- Minor version bumps (After examination what upstream changed and
after confirmation with mantainer, if any.)
The stuff you put in brackets is exactly the sort of stuff that
tends to make version bumps hard to
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 07:13:20PM +0200, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 16:52 +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
Hello
I have managed to split the desktop profile to gnome and kde submenus. The
result can be found in kde-crazy overlay (not in layman) [1]
I think this
Hey folks,
We're applying to be in Google's 2010 Summer of Code, and we need your
project ideas! If you've got a todo list a mile long and no chance of
ever getting to them all, now's your chance to have someone else spend a
summer working full-time on your idea. We're looking for things that
21 matches
Mail list logo
