Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty herd: sgml

2010-03-21 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 21 March 2010 17:22:55 Thomas Sachau wrote: > Am 21.03.2010 18:06, schrieb Mike Frysinger: > > On Sunday 21 March 2010 08:41:15 Thomas Sachau wrote: > >> I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i > >> would like to ask, if someone wants to take that herd and the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty herd: sgml

2010-03-21 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21-03-2010 11:41, Thomas Sachau wrote: > I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i would > like to ask, if someone > wants to take that herd and the related ebuilds and bugs over or if we should > delete that herd and > a

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2010-03-21 23h59 UTC

2010-03-21 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2010-03-21 23h59 UTC. Removals: x11-misc/googleearth2010-03-16 09:20:11 caster dev-tex/mplib 2010-03-16 11:40:04 ssuominen media-sound/cheesetracker

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty herd: sgml

2010-03-21 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 21.03.2010 18:06, schrieb Mike Frysinger: > On Sunday 21 March 2010 08:41:15 Thomas Sachau wrote: >> I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i would >> like to ask, if someone wants to take that herd and the related ebuilds >> and bugs over or if we should delete that h

Re: [gentoo-dev] Updating project pages to remove retired developers

2010-03-21 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Hello again. On 21-03-2010 16:26, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > Hello. > > I've just committed an update to the project pages to remove retired > developers (I left alone historical pages such as > gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/userrel/soc/archives/). The diff is attached > to this email so pro

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS="-Wl,--hash-style=gnu" to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 03/21/2010 07:41 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 21 March 2010 13:29:50 Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 03/21/2010 07:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: You *only* get the following QA notice w/ LDFLAGS="-Wl,--hash-style=gnu" >>> set: >>> forcing gnu-only hashes breaks some systems, and i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS="-Wl,--hash-style=gnu" to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread Doktor Notor
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:28:18 +0100 justin wrote: > I am probably the only one, but I really don't like the way you are > talking! Please change that, otherwise I feel to do something against > it! > > Having good ideas or pointing out correct things, doesn't give anybody > the right to talk and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS="-Wl,--hash-style=gnu" to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 21 March 2010 13:29:50 Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 03/21/2010 07:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> You *only* get the following QA notice w/ LDFLAGS="-Wl,--hash-style=gnu" > > > >> set: > > forcing gnu-only hashes breaks some systems, and is a relatively "newish" > > flag, so it isnt a c

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS="-Wl,--hash-style=gnu" to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread justin
On 21/03/10 18:13, Doktor Notor wrote: > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:04:01 -0400 > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> forcing gnu-only hashes breaks some systems, and is a relatively >> "newish" flag, so it isnt a candidate for global enabling. >> -mike > > Well... am I really so difficult to understand? >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS="-Wl,--hash-style=gnu" to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 03/21/2010 07:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> You *only* get the following QA notice w/ LDFLAGS="-Wl,--hash-style=gnu" >> set: > > forcing gnu-only hashes breaks some systems, and is a relatively "newish" > flag, so it isnt a candidate for global enabling. > -mike The developer profile target

[gentoo-dev] Updating project pages to remove retired developers

2010-03-21 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Hello. I've just committed an update to the project pages to remove retired developers (I left alone historical pages such as gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/userrel/soc/archives/). The diff is attached to this email so project members can check it. As I'm not a member of the cvstrans group (thanks Pett

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS="-Wl,--hash-style=gnu" to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 21 March 2010 13:13:12 Doktor Notor wrote: > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:04:01 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > forcing gnu-only hashes breaks some systems, and is a relatively > > "newish" flag, so it isnt a candidate for global enabling. > > -mike > > Well... am I really so difficult to unde

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS="-Wl,--hash-style=gnu" to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread Doktor Notor
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:04:01 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > forcing gnu-only hashes breaks some systems, and is a relatively > "newish" flag, so it isnt a candidate for global enabling. > -mike Well... am I really so difficult to understand? I do *NOT* want it globally enabled... I want it enabl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty herd: sgml

2010-03-21 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 21 March 2010 08:41:15 Thomas Sachau wrote: > I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i would > like to ask, if someone wants to take that herd and the related ebuilds > and bugs over or if we should delete that herd and assign related > ebuilds/bugs to m-n. if

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS="-Wl,--hash-style=gnu" to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 21 March 2010 02:15:17 Doktor Notor wrote: > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:52:36 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > remind me again why this matters ? binutils has been defaulting to > > hash- style=both for quite a while now. > > Well, I already tried in my P.S. but let me try again: I'm not > s

[gentoo-dev] Empty herd: sgml

2010-03-21 Thread Thomas Sachau
I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i would like to ask, if someone wants to take that herd and the related ebuilds and bugs over or if we should delete that herd and assign related ebuilds/bugs to m-n. -- Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer signature.asc Des

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in media-gfx/graphicsmagick: ChangeLog graphicsmagick-1.3.12.ebuild

2010-03-21 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 21-03-2010 10:35:29 +0100, Torsten Veller wrote: > > -EAPI="2" > > +EAPI="3" > > > > inherit eutils toolchain-funcs flag-o-matic perl-module > > perl-module.eclass currently does not support EAPI=3. ohw, I see, that's unfortunate. I'll open a bug. Thanks. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a

[gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in media-gfx/graphicsmagick: ChangeLog graphicsmagick-1.3.12.ebuild

2010-03-21 Thread Torsten Veller
* "Fabian Groffen (grobian)" : > grobian 10/03/21 09:24:54 > > Modified: ChangeLog graphicsmagick-1.3.12.ebuild > Log: > Add EPREFIX to configure arguments, bump to EAPI=3 > (Portage version: 2.2.00.15838-prefix/cvs/Darwin powerpc) > file : > http://sources.gentoo.org/vie