On 21 June 2010 21:23, Arun Raghavan ford_pref...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
I'm still trying to think of a good name. I understand the concerns
about introspection being too generic and non GNOME-y, but gir is
likely to cause confusion.
gir is not good because it gives near-zero information.
I
Arun Raghavan posted on Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:43:42 +0530 as excerpted:
b) For questions like - Should Python 3.x be stable?, isn't that for
team leads to decide? And for the council to resolve in case of
conflicts?
Wouldn't the point for specifically pointing out python 3.x as an example,
On 22 June 2010 15:32, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Arun Raghavan posted on Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:43:42 +0530 as excerpted:
b) For questions like - Should Python 3.x be stable?, isn't that for
team leads to decide? And for the council to resolve in case of
conflicts?
Wouldn't the point
tis 2010-06-22 klockan 15:17 +0530 skrev Arun Raghavan:
On 21 June 2010 21:23, Arun Raghavan ford_pref...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
I'm still trying to think of a good name. I understand the concerns
about introspection being too generic and non GNOME-y, but gir is
likely to cause confusion.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/06/10 15:33, Arun Raghavan wrote:
Why not just gintrospection?
I still think introspection is easier to grok. It's unlikely that
it's going to be used in a completely different sense by other
packages in the future, so let's stick with
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:33, Mike Auty ike...@gentoo.org wrote:
Gintrospection gives more information (things starting with g are
generally gnome related, which this is), and grepping for introspection
will still turn it up. It also solves the concerns that all the people
on this thread
On 20 June 2010 20:12, Arun Raghavan ford_pref...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
Any objections? I'll wait till Wed (June 23rd) before adding this if
there aren't any.
Is anyone here vehemently against introspection.
--
Arun Raghavan
http://arunraghavan.net/
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) (arunsr | GNOME)
On 22 June 2010 22:03, Mike Auty ike...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
I still think introspection is easier to grok. It's unlikely that
it's going to be used in a completely different sense by other
packages in the future, so let's stick with introspection please.
Gintrospection gives more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/06/10 18:11, Arun Raghavan wrote:
It is not a GNOME-only flag.
A general introspection flag may not be, but this isn't a general
introspection flag, this is specific to gobject and the suggestions try
to clarify that. People who want
there's nothing usable left in tree, it's bitrotted for too long.
will be masked for removal in 30 days if nobody wants to pick it up.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
there's nothing usable left in tree, it's bitrotted for too long.
will be masked for removal in 30 days if nobody wants to pick it up.
Well, I'm not using it, but I'd hate to see it go since I remember how
I was
On 06/22/2010 11:45 PM, Christoph Mende wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Samuli Suominenssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
there's nothing usable left in tree, it's bitrotted for too long.
will be masked for removal in 30 days if nobody wants to pick it up.
Well, I'm not using it, but I'd
On 23 June 2010 01:47, Mike Auty ike...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
Which should not be an issue since any library that has some sort of
introspection can use this flag (and the use.desc can be changed
appropriately at that time if it does not use gobject-introspection).
Why have to change it in
13 matches
Mail list logo
