[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-ruby/bunny: metadata.xml ChangeLog bunny-0.6.0.ebuild

2010-07-04 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 08:36 +, Benedikt Boehm (hollow) wrote: hollow 10/07/03 08:36:01 Added:metadata.xml ChangeLog bunny-0.6.0.ebuild Log: initial ebuild, thanks to Gábor Vészi (Portage version: 2.2_rc67/cvs/Linux i686) Does not install documentation. Does

[gentoo-dev] Council Election Results

2010-07-04 Thread Roy Bamford
Team, The four election officials have determined that result of the 2010 council election, in order of votes cast is :- Final ranked list: ferringb halcy0n jmbsvicetto chainsaw betelgeuse scarabeus wired patrick phajdan.jr sping _reopen_nominations On behalf of the election offcials --

[gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Lars Wendler
Hi list, now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To be honest I was really looking forward for openrc/baselayout-2 finally becoming stable in Gentoo but this seems to be quite implausible now that openrc has no upstream anymore. If there's anyone out there who would

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council Election Results

2010-07-04 Thread Markos Chandras
Attached you may find the master-council ballot. Use it along with your confirmation number ( which you will receive shortly ) to confirm your ballot. Thank you, Markos On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Roy Bamford neddyseag...@gentoo.org wrote: Team, The four election officials have

[gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 07/04/2010 05:29 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: Hi list, now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To be honest I was really looking forward for openrc/baselayout-2 finally becoming stable in Gentoo but this seems to be quite implausible now that openrc has no upstream

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Fabio Erculiani
How are we supposed to handle the amount of installations out there that are using OpenRC then? OpenRC/bl-2 have proven to be a big improvement over the old stuff. I am for fixing current bugs, and keep it maintenance mode at least. I'm already spread over several things but I could give a hand to

[gentoo-dev] Re: Council Election Results

2010-07-04 Thread Ulrich Mueller
Hello fellow devs and Gentoo community, in the 2010 Council election we had 270 eligable voters and 110 submitted votes, which corresponds to a turnout of about 41 %. The full ranked list for this election is: ferringb halcy0n jmbsvicetto chainsaw betelgeuse scarabeus wired

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 04-07-2010 a las 16:29 +0200, Lars Wendler escribió: Hi list, now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To be honest I was really looking forward for openrc/baselayout-2 finally becoming stable in Gentoo but this seems to be quite implausible now that

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Markos Chandras
That would be the best but I wonder who has the time to even support this maintenance mode. We could ask for help from our user community. Maybe some of our users are quite familiar with the code and be able to pick up the load fast enough On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Fabio Erculiani

[gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Daniel Schömer
Nikos Chantziaras schrieb: On 07/04/2010 05:29 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? How about switching to something that has a very active upstream? http://bugs.gentoo.org/150190 I just want to throw in systemd:

[gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 17:17:25 +0200 Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: How are we supposed to handle the amount of installations out there that are using OpenRC then? OpenRC/bl-2 have proven to be a big improvement over the old stuff. I am for fixing current bugs, and keep it maintenance

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Jory A. Pratt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/04/2010 02:39 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 17:17:25 +0200 Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: How are we supposed to handle the amount of installations out there that are using OpenRC then? OpenRC/bl-2 have proven to be a

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday, July 04, 2010 10:29:57 Lars Wendler wrote: now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To be honest I was really looking forward for openrc/baselayout-2 finally becoming stable in Gentoo but this seems to be quite implausible now that openrc has no upstream

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Lars Wendler
Am Sonntag 04 Juli 2010, 23:02:39 schrieb Mike Frysinger: On Sunday, July 04, 2010 10:29:57 Lars Wendler wrote: now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To be honest I was really looking forward for openrc/baselayout-2 finally becoming stable in Gentoo but this

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday, July 04, 2010 18:04:29 Lars Wendler wrote: Am Sonntag 04 Juli 2010, 23:02:39 schrieb Mike Frysinger: On Sunday, July 04, 2010 10:29:57 Lars Wendler wrote: now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To be honest I was really looking forward for

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Lars Wendler
Am Montag 05 Juli 2010, 00:15:44 schrieb Mike Frysinger: it certainly doesnt warrant a paniced the sky is falling message. Which I was nowhere trying to imply. I just wanted to have this situation sorted out which now hopefully seems to be the case. -- Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) Gentoo

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2010-07-04 23h59 UTC

2010-07-04 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2010-07-04 23h59 UTC. Removals: x11-misc/lintar 2010-06-30 09:36:40 hwoarang dev-java/struts-legacy 2010-06-30 21:06:47 caster Additions: net-irc/xchat-otr

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Olivier Crête
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: which is trivial to fix and anyone with commit privs could have done. it certainly doesnt warrant a paniced the sky is falling message. I think this is a great occasion to dump our stupid custom crap and switch to SystemD, PolicyKit,

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Brian Harring
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 09:03:41PM -0400, Olivier Crrrte wrote: On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: which is trivial to fix and anyone with commit privs could have done. it certainly doesnt warrant a paniced the sky is falling message. I think this is a great

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday, July 04, 2010 21:03:41 Olivier Crête wrote: On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: which is trivial to fix and anyone with commit privs could have done. it certainly doesnt warrant a paniced the sky is falling message. I think this is a great occasion to dump

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Richard Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On 07/04/2010 04:09 PM, Jory A. Pratt wrote: For those of you not on the #gentoo-dev channel, I just announced I am gonna be looking at the openrc code and fixing the bugs and working to continue the development. Anyone

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
2010/7/5 Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org: On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: which is trivial to fix and anyone with commit privs could have done.  it certainly doesnt warrant a paniced the sky is falling message. I think this is a great occasion to dump our stupid