On 07/12/2010 12:56 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
I remember very clearly as you and I were both council members at the
time. My point is that this discussion does not need to even happen
and the council shouldn't even remotely be involved here.
I assumed the best way to change policy would be
This revision should be masked. It is a development series release. The
only reason you might need this currently is because of packages passing
bad compile options for release packages like -DG_DISABLED_DEPRECATED
and company. Please check gthumb fix for how to handle such misleaded
packages.
--
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (12 Jul 2010)
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
# No longer developed by upstream, fails with forced as-needed (bug
#277169),
# does not compile against gnome-desktop-2.30 (bug #311563).
gnome-base/eel
gnome-extra/nautilus-cd-burner
El lun, 12-07-2010 a las 12:13 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue escribió:
This revision should be masked. It is a development series release. The
only reason you might need this currently is because of packages passing
bad compile options for release packages like -DG_DISABLED_DEPRECATED
and
It's used by sys-fs/clamfs and net-p2p/fms, bug 269422 has been open for
over an year and now it's also blocking OpenSSL 1.0.0 (bug 327769).
If noone picks it up i'll lastrite poco, clamfs and fms in a week.
- Samuli
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote:
* Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org schrieb:
Thats not even necessary. They just should use the infrastructure,
as described in my paper. So everyone can easily set up automatic
notifications, cherry-pick, etc, etc.
On 07/12/2010 12:12 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 07/12/2010 07:53 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On 07/11/2010 02:50 PM, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) wrote:
-LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1
+LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 ${LDFLAGS}
My existing, custom, entry for LDFLAGS breaks with this change. Not nice.
%% grep LDFLAGS
On 07/12/2010 03:50 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On 07/12/2010 12:12 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 07/12/2010 07:53 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On 07/11/2010 02:50 PM, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) wrote:
-LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1
+LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 ${LDFLAGS}
My existing, custom, entry for LDFLAGS breaks with
El lun, 12-07-2010 a las 12:18 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (12 Jul 2010)
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
# No longer developed by upstream, fails with forced as-needed (bug
#277169),
# does not compile against gnome-desktop-2.30 (bug #311563).
gnome-base/eel
# Lars Wendler polynomia...@gentoo.org (12 Jul 2010)
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
# No active maintainer.
www-client/seamonkey-bin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
The new Gentoo Council will hold a special introductory meeting this
Wednesday, 14/7 at 19H00 UTC. A regular meeting will be held on Monday
26/7 at 19H00 UTC. We'll be sending in the next few days an email about
that meeting, so please don't
On 7/12/10 4:08 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Gentoo Council 14/7 meeting goals:
* set some base rules for the operation of the new council
* listen to the community to check whether there are any issues it
wants to bring to the attention of the council
I'd like to push a small
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 07/12/2010 12:56 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
I remember very clearly as you and I were both council members at the
time. My point is that this discussion does not need to even happen
and the council shouldn't even
Last rites: x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-71.86.x
The Video ABI in these drivers is no longer supported by any version
of x11-base/xorg-server that Gentoo has in the tree. Gentoo has not
had a version that supported this video ABI in the tree for some time
now. As a result, this version will leave
14 matches
Mail list logo
