[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/supervisor: ChangeLog supervisor-3.0_alpha9.ebuild

2010-10-01 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 23/09/2010 в 20:18 +, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (arfrever) пишет: src_install() { distutils_src_install newinitd ${FILESDIR}/init.d supervisord newconfd ${FILESDIR}/conf.d supervisord || die is necessary after newinitd/newconfd. This will prevent broken

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: dev-tex/achemso

2010-10-01 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
On Friday 01 October 2010 08:53:11 Thilo Bangert wrote: Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org said: TexLive 2009 already contains achemso-3.0, and we have a separate ebuild for 1.0 ... I am probably missing somthing, but texlive-2009 is not stable yet, is it? True, and yes, I missed

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/sympy/files: sympy-0.6.7-python-2.7.patch

2010-10-01 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 24/09/2010 в 20:09 +, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (arfrever) пишет: Added:sympy-0.6.7-python-2.7.patch Log: Fix majority of test failures with Python 2.7 (bug #330713). This patch fixes not test failure, but sympy's ability to work with python-2.7.

[gentoo-dev] QA last rites for app-i18n/fcitx

2010-10-01 Thread Diego E . Pettenò
# Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (01 Oct 2010) # on behalf of QA team # # Overflows during build (bug #301795); need a new maintainer # at least, but there are a number of alternative IMEs that # shouldn't have these problems. # # Removal on 2010-11-30 app-i18n/fcitx

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/sympy/files: sympy-0.6.7-python-2.7.patch

2010-10-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno ven, 01/10/2010 alle 12.30 +0400, Peter Volkov ha scritto: This patch fixes not test failure, but sympy's ability to work with python-2.7. Although python-2.7 is currently masked it will be unmasked soon and some users may have it installed already. Looks like revision bump to

[gentoo-dev] .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-01 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hi lads, due to recent situation about .la files status we would like to inform users about this situation. See attached file that we propose to be included as news item. Step 2 will be finding global policy how to get rid of them as fast as possible without too much more hassle for our users :)

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-libs/libproxy: ChangeLog libproxy-0.4.6.ebuild

2010-10-01 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 29/09/2010 в 20:43 +, Pacho Ramos (pacho) пишет: pkg_setup() { if use python; then python_set_active_version 2 fi It's much shorter and clearer to write use python python_set_active_version 2 -- Peter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-01 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 01/10/2010 в 12:27 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal пишет: this can be done either by using the (currently testing) Portage 2.1.9 series, or by adding the following snippet to your /etc/portage/bashrc: post_src_install() { lafilefixer ${D} } It's better to avoid suggesting this as such

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

2010-10-01 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 01.10.2010 15:07, schrieb Peter Volkov: В Пнд, 27/09/2010 в 11:37 +, Dirkjan Ochtman (djc) пишет: [[ ${i} == README || ${i} == examples || ${i} == defer ]] continue [[ ${i} == auth-pam ]] ! use pam continue einfo

[gentoo-dev] QA last rites for app-doc/heirloom-doctools

2010-10-01 Thread Diego E . Pettenò
# Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (01 Oct 2010) # on behalf of QA team # # Upstream seems to be dead, and keeping importing it from # OpenSolaris unlikely; too many man pages installed by our # packages are not compatible with it. # # Removal on 2010-11-30 app-doc/heirloom-doctools

[gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno ven, 01/10/2010 alle 17.31 +0400, Peter Volkov ha scritto: It's better to avoid suggesting this as such things tend to stay for a very long time on user's systems and since this'll became redundant once portage 2.1.9 will go stable soon it'll la files will be fixed twice for no

Re: [gentoo-dev] .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-01 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
2010/10/1 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org: Hi lads, due to recent situation about .la files status we would like to inform users about this situation. See attached file that we propose to be included as news item. Step 2 will be finding global policy how to get rid of them as fast as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

2010-10-01 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: В Пнд, 27/09/2010 в 11:37 +, Dirkjan Ochtman (djc) пишет: src_compile() {       use static sed -i -e '/^LIBS/s/LIBS = /LIBS = -static /' Makefile       emake || die make failed       if ! use minimal ; then            

Re: [gentoo-dev] .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-01 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/01/2010 08:13 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: Does lafilefixer fix binpkgs now? As well as the vdb manifests for the files? If it doesn't, I strongly object to having it as an official recommendation. A surprisingly large no. of people (at least on bugzilla) have FEATURES=buildpkg . It

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-libs/libproxy: ChangeLog libproxy-0.4.6.ebuild

2010-10-01 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-10-01 15:15:56 Peter Volkov napisał(a): В Срд, 29/09/2010 в 20:43 +, Pacho Ramos (pacho) пишет: pkg_setup() { if use python; then python_set_active_version 2 fi It's much shorter and clearer to write use python python_set_active_version 2 Calling

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-libs/libproxy: ChangeLog libproxy-0.4.6.ebuild

2010-10-01 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 01-10-2010 a las 17:15 +0400, Peter Volkov escribió: В Срд, 29/09/2010 в 20:43 +, Pacho Ramos (pacho) пишет: pkg_setup() { if use python; then python_set_active_version 2 fi It's much shorter and clearer to write use python python_set_active_version

[gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno ven, 01/10/2010 alle 20.43 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan ha scritto: Does lafilefixer fix binpkgs now? As well as the vdb manifests for the files? If it doesn't, I strongly object to having it as an official recommendation. A surprisingly large no. of people (at least on bugzilla) have

[gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno ven, 01/10/2010 alle 18.42 +0300, Eray Aslan ha scritto: Why not push for stabilization of 2.1.9 and then do the news item? Am I missing something? Yah, the bickering of some people at having .la files disappear under their feet, probably because they are affectionate to them, or

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/sympy/files: sympy-0.6.7-python-2.7.patch

2010-10-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno ven, 01/10/2010 alle 15.32 +0400, Peter Volkov ha scritto: I was talking about case where python-2.7 it is already installed (although it is hard masked it is already in the tree). In such case python-updater will not be run. Ah sorry I misread that it as sympy, not Python… yes I

[gentoo-dev] Help on f-spot-0.8 problem

2010-10-01 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello Since Calchan doesn't have much time for f-spot and dotnet team is conformed basically by me, I would welcome any help for trying to bump f-spot to its 0.8 version. The problem is that eautoreconf doesn't run, even running autoreconf on unpacked upstream sources fails with the following

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/sympy/files: sympy-0.6.7-python-2.7.patch

2010-10-01 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-10-01 10:30:22 Peter Volkov napisał(a): В Птн, 24/09/2010 в 20:09 +, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (arfrever) пишет: Added:sympy-0.6.7-python-2.7.patch Log: Fix majority of test failures with Python 2.7 (bug #330713). This patch fixes not test

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-01 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/01/2010 12:12 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com wrote: Il giorno ven, 01/10/2010 alle 20.43 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan ha scritto: Does lafilefixer fix binpkgs now? As well as the vdb manifests for the files? If it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-01 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 10/01/2010 12:12 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: Right, so a few weeks later when they re-merge a binpkg, they suddenly get build failures again. And that confuses them since it's unexpected. This is in general a bad

Re: [gentoo-dev] .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-01 Thread Alistair Bush
Hi lads, due to recent situation about .la files status we would like to inform users about this situation. See attached file that we propose to be included as news item. Would it not be a better solution to have this information documented properly under Upgrade Guides or Gentoo System

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-01 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/01/2010 02:10 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 10/01/2010 12:12 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: Right, so a few weeks later when they re-merge a binpkg, they suddenly get build failures again. And that confuses them since

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno ven, 01/10/2010 alle 21.22 +0200, Enrico Weigelt ha scritto: Why not just introducing a FEAUTURE or USE flag which causes them not to be installed at all ? Because don't ask obvious questions unless you read the original references. Libtool archive files are used by ImageMagick,

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno sab, 02/10/2010 alle 00.42 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan ha scritto: Right, so a few weeks later when they re-merge a binpkg, they suddenly get build failures again. And that confuses them since it's unexpected. This is in general a bad experience for stable users who want to get work

[gentoo-dev] issue with gentoo-x86 cvs repo

2010-10-01 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
hi, yesterday i was able to use the repo but now i get this error (for any cvs command): $ cvs rm -f apgdiff-2.0.2.ebuild Your account has expired; please contact your system administrator Connection closed by 81.93.255.6 cvs [remove aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if

Re: [gentoo-dev] issue with gentoo-x86 cvs repo

2010-10-01 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 03:19:42AM +0200, Miroslav ?ulc (fordfrog) wrote: hi, yesterday i was able to use the repo but now i get this error (for any cvs command): $ cvs rm -f apgdiff-2.0.2.ebuild Your account has expired; please contact your system administrator Connection closed by

Re: [gentoo-dev] .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-01 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 10:20 Sat 02 Oct , Alistair Bush wrote: Would it not be a better solution to have this information documented properly under Upgrade Guides or Gentoo System Documentation and then have this news item linked to it. This is a good point if it turns out that this isn't temporary. See

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/openvpn: ChangeLog openvpn-2.1.3.ebuild

2010-10-01 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:47:38 +0530 Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: В Пнд, 27/09/2010 в 11:37 +, Dirkjan Ochtman (djc) пишет: src_compile() {       use static sed -i -e '/^LIBS/s/LIBS = /LIBS = -static /'

[gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)

2010-10-01 Thread Duncan
Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Sat, 02 Oct 2010 03:06:56 +0200 as excerpted: Il giorno sab, 02/10/2010 alle 00.42 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan ha scritto: Right, so a few weeks later when they re-merge a binpkg, they suddenly get build failures again. And that confuses them since it's unexpected.