# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (7 Oct 2010)
# Unmaintained since 2006 by upstream, no required by
# any package in the tree (bug #340039) and most
# distributions have already dropped it.
#
# Removal on 2010-11-07
dev-dotnet/ant-dotnet
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
* David Leverton levert...@googlemail.com schrieb:
And for Distros, it doesnt make sense to try to support anything imaginable.
Not breaking things that already work would be a decent compromise.
Any concerete example on what would break if .la files aren't
installed anymore ?
I'm now
RHJ == Robin H Johnson robb...@gentoo.org writes:
Include the signing keyid in the filename to support both allowing
multiple devs to sign a file and an easy indication of who signed it.
RHJ You can extract keyid from any signature trivially.
But if it is not in the filename you cannot have
Hello devs,
I've just committed a new eclass to gx86 -- it's called scons-utils
and it's supposed to help creating clean ebuilds for packages using
the SCons buildsystem.
Right now, the eclass addresses the two following important issues:
${MAKEOPTS} cleaning
Currently the
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:17:01AM -0400, James Cloos wrote:
RHJ == Robin H Johnson robb...@gentoo.org writes:
Include the signing keyid in the filename to support both allowing
multiple devs to sign a file and an easy indication of who signed it.
RHJ You can extract keyid from any
On 20:26 Wed 06 Oct , Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 12:52:33 -0500
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
local flag=${1}
local varname=${2:-${flag#!}}
Could you explain how this works to me, please? It seems like you're
reversing the logic when people use
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:08:30 -0500
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
So what happens if I want the !use syntax and say `use_scons !ssl
nossl`?
${2} is set then, and ${flag#!} isn't even evaluated.
BTW I've changed that already to make $(use_scons !ssl) output nossl.
This should be
