# Pacho Ramos (7 Oct 2010)
# Unmaintained since 2006 by upstream, no required by
# any package in the tree (bug #340039) and most
# distributions have already dropped it.
#
# Removal on 2010-11-07
dev-dotnet/ant-dotnet
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
* David Leverton schrieb:
> > And for Distros, it doesnt make sense to try to support anything imaginable.
>
> Not breaking things that already work would be a decent compromise.
Any concerete example on what would break if .la files aren't
installed anymore ?
> > I'm now working in embedded
> "RHJ" == Robin H Johnson writes:
>> Include the signing keyid in the filename to support both allowing
>> multiple devs to sign a file and an easy indication of who signed it.
RHJ> You can extract keyid from any signature trivially.
But if it is not in the filename you cannot have multipl
Hello devs,
I've just committed a new eclass to gx86 -- it's called scons-utils
and it's supposed to help creating clean ebuilds for packages using
the SCons buildsystem.
Right now, the eclass addresses the two following important issues:
${MAKEOPTS} cleaning
Currently the
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:17:01AM -0400, James Cloos wrote:
> > "RHJ" == Robin H Johnson writes:
> >> Include the signing keyid in the filename to support both allowing
> >> multiple devs to sign a file and an easy indication of who signed it.
> RHJ> You can extract keyid from any signature t
On 20:26 Wed 06 Oct , Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 12:52:33 -0500
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
> > > local flag=${1}
> > > local varname=${2:-${flag#!}}
> >
> > Could you explain how this works to me, please? It seems like you're
> > reversing the logic when people use the !fl
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:08:30 -0500
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> So what happens if I want the !use syntax and say `use_scons !ssl
> nossl`?
${2} is set then, and ${flag#!} isn't even evaluated.
BTW I've changed that already to make $(use_scons !ssl) output nossl.
This should be more logical.
--
B