Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for Lua related packages
On 11/2/10 4:24 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote: I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff. Just checking: how many packages would be in the new category? Generally sounds good. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for Lua related packages
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 04:24, Rafael Goncalves Martins rafaelmart...@gentoo.org wrote: I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff. +1. Cheers, Dirkjan
Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code-In: 13-18 year olds in open source
On 09:11 Fri 29 Oct , Donnie Berkholz wrote: We now have 2 ideas. It's not even worth applying unless we can get closer to 10. If nobody puts up more ideas in the next ~6 hours, we won't be participating this year. Thanks to your help, we got enough ideas just in time to apply. We should hear Friday whether we're in. -- Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com pgpDAjyX90yxV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for Lua related packages
On 08:09 Tue 02 Nov , Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: On 11/2/10 4:24 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote: I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff. Just checking: how many packages would be in the new category? In case anyone was wondering, I wanted to check how many packages typically showed up in a category. Here's a histogram of the distribution. The number of packages are in column 1, and the number of categories having that many packages are in column 2 (bin size 10, number shown ±5). To summarize, half the categories have 10-50 packages, then there are a number of huge ones. If you can get at least 15 packages, it's a reasonable starting point for a new category. 5 5 15 19 25 15 35 21 45 14 55 9 65 7 75 10 85 9 95 2 105 7 115 1 125 4 135 4 145 1 165 1 185 4 195 1 205 1 215 1 225 1 245 2 255 1 265 3 295 2 345 2 355 2 375 1 485 1 545 1 985 1 -- Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com pgpEGXSCT9Rv3.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: acerhk and acer_acpi
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (02 Nov 2010) # acerhk fails to build with Linux = 2.6.30 wrt #277598 # acer_acpi is included in Linux since = 2.6.25 wrt #208577 # and fails parallel make too # Removal in 30 days app-laptop/acerhk app-laptop/acer_acpi
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:41:34PM +0300, Peter Volkov wrote:
В Вск, 31/10/2010 в 16:38 +0200, Alex Alexander пишет:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:50:02AM +, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:59:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
Isn't this essentially what the default profile is? Basically server is
just default + USE=apache2 ldap mysql snmp truetype xml.
Well it shouldn't be like that. And if the default profile is pretty
much the same as the server one, then please consider removing the
server profile as it makes no sense then
Please don't. The fact that there are only a few changes doesn't make it
useless. Also, you'd be forcing all users currently using the profile to
migrate without any real reason.
But what is the target group of this profile? It sets only 6 USE flags
that are really useless on half of servers (e.g. VPN/mail server). I'd
better set only -perl -python there to make servers less dependent on
python/perl updaters and decrease rebuilds for servers. Also it's good
idea to make them hardened only as hardened works very well for
servers.
--
Peter.
Attached you may find my final proposal for server profiles.
--
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
Key ID: 441AC410
Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410
Index: default/linux/amd64/10.0/server/profile.bashrc
===
RCS file:
/var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/default/linux/amd64/10.0/server/profile.bashrc,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -b -B -u -r1.1 profile.bashrc
--- default/linux/amd64/10.0/server/profile.bashrc 6 Aug 2009 06:33:39
- 1.1
+++ default/linux/amd64/10.0/server/profile.bashrc 2 Nov 2010 20:28:19
-
@@ -6,16 +6,10 @@
then
if [[ ! ${I_KNOW_WHAT_I_AM_DOING} == yes ]]
then
- ewarn This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not
considered to be
- ewarn a supported server profile at this time. For a
supported server
- ewarn profile, please check the Hardened project
(http://hardened.gentoo.org).
echo
ewarn This profile is merely a convenience for people who
require a more
ewarn minimal profile, yet are unable to use hardened due to
restrictions in
- ewarn the software being used on the server. This profile
should also be used
- ewarn if you require GCC 4.1 or Glibc 2.4 support. If you
don't know if this
- ewarn applies to you, then it doesn't and you should probably
be using
- ewarn Hardened, instead.
+ ewarn the software being used on the server.
echo
fi
fi
Index: targets/server/make.defaults
===
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/targets/server/make.defaults,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -B -u -r1.2 make.defaults
--- targets/server/make.defaults17 Aug 2009 18:32:10 - 1.2
+++ targets/server/make.defaults2 Nov 2010 20:28:20 -
@@ -2,4 +2,4 @@
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/targets/server/make.defaults,v 1.2
2009/08/17 18:32:10 ssuominen Exp $
-USE=apache2 ldap mysql snmp truetype xml
+USE=-perl -python snmp truetype xml
pgpMEDQEFGMJx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/portage: portage-2.2.0_alpha1.ebuild portage-2.2_rc67.ebuild ChangeLog portage-2.2.0_alpha3.ebuild portage-2.2.0_alpha2.ebuild
On Monday 01 November 2010 13:33:47 Zac Medico (zmedico) wrote: zmedico 10/11/01 16:33:47 Modified: portage-2.2.0_alpha1.ebuild portage-2.2_rc67.ebuild ChangeLog portage-2.2.0_alpha3.ebuild portage-2.2.0_alpha2.ebuild Log: Drop keywords from portage-2.2*, as a substitute for masking via package.mask. This alleviates issues for cases like bug #336692 in which people want to use profiles to unmask portage-2.2. Does portage 2.1 have preserve-libs? If not, pretty please, readd the ~sparc- fbsd and ~x86-fbsd keywords. We unmasked portage 2.2 a while ago because we relied on preserve-libs for the upgrades. Esp. one where libc.so.6 becomes libc.so.7... without preserve-libs its almost impossible to upgrade from one release to another one without a full reinstall. A.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02-11-2010 19:30, Markos Chandras wrote: - - ewarn This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not considered to be - - ewarn a supported server profile at this time. For a supported server - - ewarn profile, please check the Hardened project (http://hardened.gentoo.org). As was stated a few times in this thread, simply dropping this ewarn without adding a warning somewhere that anyone looking for a production server profile should be looking at hardened, doesn't seem prudent to me. - -- Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJM0J13AAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEPrEAP/3GNLyH67SLszchOL1wjvctE xEZ+yCDrTexXmc1A4YzqYKjVicTXgDdmIPThwD274YTGCfOqCzgOalcTqfHEu6X3 W3044m/YOHi1BeNpNXnLqdyleVFKtDs8YvsZkawUFIgyjMOQ0sKzetyORkk4QE4N 5kr6c4eGN36uIpe2P7viufgvgxAaJwP4k2xsVmVKOpMzGkGLmq8WNeeGTZZ4Jw9O LPD70gI+QBtgYYzqFMB5XMxA2ia4kYJibCrrzC9sqnRpfEStXXXSAWcjUn8aslOw +h4ITENwAqY/exRDLpTHXWpU5SzLz+UU9Y1BG8hKUtKEl++iVjFMn6GePRWjJHA8 mCmkRJ0ku4RscI73qhKjQQdxPEttfvvyfnaS5JdznJMJ/0MyvWV1MMV+j9eKprQq rAnRAZPbe1slh8Egnj2Cd4lik2L9ek3hAyLu0LEvW47IEJyi8LF5Z7ar9hN+ZJw5 IwV22/PYc5g/2Ukl+InHWXjtGrNWx7k3KD5D1O7pwkVnGo5ZRvj0AIgM3u7LWLBb llIFzf1boE6gFen2WgW+GvKngFtX4c8TqBvMLEBs17S3kESSEIzeqCBCuYqAVMEX vXO/En3NwlyiZ4bhfOOSgo3eQvclJKM6yCK6gDb8rfZFUptyIicQF1AkyFQw7mjN Y0UY+STLK4I0oW7bK3Sq =a9yz -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:23:36PM -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02-11-2010 19:30, Markos Chandras wrote:
- - ewarn This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not
considered to be
- - ewarn a supported server profile at this time. For a supported
server
- - ewarn profile, please check the Hardened project
(http://hardened.gentoo.org).
As was stated a few times in this thread, simply dropping this ewarn
without adding a warning somewhere that anyone looking for a production
server profile should be looking at hardened, doesn't seem prudent to me.
Hmm ok. Updated now
- --
Regards,
Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=a9yz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
Key ID: 441AC410
Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410
Index: default/linux/amd64/10.0/server/profile.bashrc
===
RCS file:
/var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/default/linux/amd64/10.0/server/profile.bashrc,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -b -B -u -r1.1 profile.bashrc
--- default/linux/amd64/10.0/server/profile.bashrc 6 Aug 2009 06:33:39
- 1.1
+++ default/linux/amd64/10.0/server/profile.bashrc 2 Nov 2010 23:34:02
-
@@ -6,16 +6,12 @@
then
if [[ ! ${I_KNOW_WHAT_I_AM_DOING} == yes ]]
then
- ewarn This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not
considered to be
- ewarn a supported server profile at this time. For a
supported server
- ewarn profile, please check the Hardened project
(http://hardened.gentoo.org).
echo
ewarn This profile is merely a convenience for people who
require a more
ewarn minimal profile, yet are unable to use hardened due to
restrictions in
- ewarn the software being used on the server. This profile
should also be used
- ewarn if you require GCC 4.1 or Glibc 2.4 support. If you
don't know if this
- ewarn applies to you, then it doesn't and you should probably
be using
- ewarn Hardened, instead.
+ ewarn the software being used on the server. If you seek for a
secure
+ ewarn production server profile, please check the Hardened
project
+ ewarn (http://hardened.gentoo.org)
echo
fi
fi
Index: targets/server/make.defaults
===
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/targets/server/make.defaults,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -B -u -r1.2 make.defaults
--- targets/server/make.defaults17 Aug 2009 18:32:10 - 1.2
+++ targets/server/make.defaults2 Nov 2010 23:34:03 -
@@ -2,4 +2,4 @@
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/targets/server/make.defaults,v 1.2
2009/08/17 18:32:10 ssuominen Exp $
-USE=apache2 ldap mysql snmp truetype xml
+USE=-perl -python snmp truetype xml
pgp3cJ4oG4Xgo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] re-assigning SynCE bugs to me
Hi hwoarang, I noticed you've reassigned a bunch of SynCE bugs to me (which is fine, since I guess I'm the meta...) but I was wondering if there was some request from mescalinum, or if you're just being proactive? I haven't heard from him for a while, so I might be without a dev to commit any fixes I can make anyway. thanks, -- Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au
[gentoo-dev] Re: re-assigning SynCE bugs to me
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 09:19:51AM +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: Hi hwoarang, I noticed you've reassigned a bunch of SynCE bugs to me (which is fine, since I guess I'm the meta...) but I was wondering if there was some request from mescalinum, or if you're just being proactive? I haven't heard from him for a while, so I might be without a dev to commit any fixes I can make anyway. thanks, -- Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au Hi Iain mescalinum is being retired due to extensive inactivity http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223981 -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org Key ID: 441AC410 Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410 pgpeDhs1libe2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: re-assigning SynCE bugs to me
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:59:36 + Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: I noticed you've reassigned a bunch of SynCE bugs to me mescalinum is being retired due to extensive inactivity In that case, with no committer, it ought to be either a herd or maintainer-needed. jer
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/portage: portage-2.2.0_alpha1.ebuild portage-2.2_rc67.ebuild ChangeLog portage-2.2.0_alpha3.ebuild portage-2.2.0_alpha2.ebuild
On 11/02/2010 03:20 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Monday 01 November 2010 13:33:47 Zac Medico (zmedico) wrote: zmedico 10/11/01 16:33:47 Modified: portage-2.2.0_alpha1.ebuild portage-2.2_rc67.ebuild ChangeLog portage-2.2.0_alpha3.ebuild portage-2.2.0_alpha2.ebuild Log: Drop keywords from portage-2.2*, as a substitute for masking via package.mask. This alleviates issues for cases like bug #336692 in which people want to use profiles to unmask portage-2.2. Does portage 2.1 have preserve-libs? If not, pretty please, readd the ~sparc- fbsd and ~x86-fbsd keywords. We unmasked portage 2.2 a while ago because we relied on preserve-libs for the upgrades. Esp. one where libc.so.6 becomes libc.so.7... without preserve-libs its almost impossible to upgrade from one release to another one without a full reinstall. A. Alright, I've added back the *-fbsd keywords now. -- Thanks, Zac
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: re-assigning SynCE bugs to me
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:12:16AM +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:59:36 + Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: I noticed you've reassigned a bunch of SynCE bugs to me mescalinum is being retired due to extensive inactivity In that case, with no committer, it ought to be either a herd or maintainer-needed. jer Jer, pda herd is responsible for mescalinums' app-pda/synce* packages. Take a look on metadata.xml -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org Key ID: 441AC410 Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410 pgpgmNVXXnjtW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: re-assigning SynCE bugs to me
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 01:12 +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:59:36 + Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: I noticed you've reassigned a bunch of SynCE bugs to me mescalinum is being retired due to extensive inactivity In that case, with no committer, it ought to be either a herd or maintainer-needed. thanks guys. Or maybe I should look at that quiz again ;) What's the required involvement? 1 commit a month? Would it be worthwhile or more likely to just find another maintainer? (I notice the pda herd is quite light on). thanks, -- Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au Brain fried -- Core dumped
