Hi,
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 18:48 -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
there was a very recent thread in this ml about these packages and the
conclusion was that they fall to the pda herd. The proxy-user also asked
for help and showed interest in working to become a developer.
FYI work
On 11/05/2010 08:33 AM, Joshua Saddler wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:03:13 +0200
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (04 Nov 2010)
# Over 20 open bugs, http://tinyurl.com/2wurbtz
# Bugs assigned to a proxy maintainer without CVS access
# Every
On 11/05/2010 10:29 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
This sucks. *synce* stuff is covered in a our documentation,
including a PDA guide and a debugging HowTo. Any chance of holding
off on the mask/removal?
Added longer removal date. 2011-01-01.
Unfortunately 0.14 is in so bad shape there's
* Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org:
Torsten Veller t...@gentoo.org wrote:
If nobody is interested, I'll mask them for removal in one week.
If nobody is interested indeed, I'd appreciate a longer removal period
Longer than the typical 30 days?
Alternatively I can move the packages from the
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:56:44 +0100
Torsten Veller t...@gentoo.org wrote:
* Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org:
Torsten Veller t...@gentoo.org wrote:
If nobody is interested, I'll mask them for removal in one week.
If nobody is interested indeed, I'd appreciate a longer removal
period
On 10:02 Tue 02 Nov , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Thanks to your help, we got enough ideas just in time to apply. We
should hear Friday whether we're in.
Unfortunately we weren't accepted. This was a highly selective set
compared to GSoC -- only 20 organizations instead of 150. Perhaps next
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:23:36PM -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02-11-2010 19:30, Markos Chandras wrote:
- - ewarn This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not
considered to be
- - ewarn a supported
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (06 Nov 2010)
# No longer maintained neither developed by upstream since
# a lot of time. Nothing in the tree needs it (bug #344331)
# Replaced by gnome-base/nautilus. Removal 2010-12-06.
gnome-base/gnome-volume-manager
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Looks like the new category is created and the packages are moved!
If you have some issue with the pkgmoves, please reopen the tracker
bug,open a new bug and make the tracker depends on it.
Thanks guys! :)
--
Rafael Goncalves Martins
Gentoo Linux developer
http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/
