Looks like the new category is created and the packages are moved!
If you have some issue with the pkgmoves, please reopen the tracker
bug,open a new bug and make the tracker depends on it.
Thanks guys! :)
--
Rafael Goncalves Martins
Gentoo Linux developer
http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/
# Pacho Ramos (06 Nov 2010)
# No longer maintained neither developed by upstream since
# a lot of time. Nothing in the tree needs it (bug #344331)
# Replaced by gnome-base/nautilus. Removal 2010-12-06.
gnome-base/gnome-volume-manager
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messag
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:23:36PM -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02-11-2010 19:30, Markos Chandras wrote:
> - - ewarn "This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not
> considered to be"
> - - ewarn "a s
On 10:02 Tue 02 Nov , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Thanks to your help, we got enough ideas just in time to apply. We
> should hear Friday whether we're in.
Unfortunately we weren't accepted. This was a highly selective set
compared to GSoC -- only 20 organizations instead of 150. Perhaps next
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:56:44 +0100
Torsten Veller wrote:
> * Michał Górny :
> > Torsten Veller wrote:
> >
> > > If nobody is interested, I'll mask them for removal in one week.
> >
> > If nobody is interested indeed, I'd appreciate a longer removal
> > period
>
> Longer than the typical 30 day
* Michał Górny :
> Torsten Veller wrote:
>
> > If nobody is interested, I'll mask them for removal in one week.
>
> If nobody is interested indeed, I'd appreciate a longer removal period
Longer than the typical 30 days?
Alternatively I can move the packages from the perl herd to
maintainer-nee
On 11/05/2010 10:29 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> This sucks. *synce* stuff is covered in a our documentation,
>> including a PDA guide and a debugging HowTo. Any chance of holding
>> off on the mask/removal?
>
> Added longer removal date. 2011-01-01.
>
> Unfortunately 0.14 is in so bad shape the
On 11/05/2010 08:33 AM, Joshua Saddler wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:03:13 +0200
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
>> # Samuli Suominen (04 Nov 2010)
>> # Over 20 open bugs, http://tinyurl.com/2wurbtz
>> # Bugs assigned to a proxy maintainer without CVS access
>> # Every package outdated, bug 340007
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 18:48 -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> there was a very recent thread in this ml about these packages and the
> conclusion was that they fall to the pda herd. The proxy-user also asked
> for help and showed interest in working to become a developer.
FYI work f
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:03:13 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> # Samuli Suominen (04 Nov 2010)
> # Over 20 open bugs, http://tinyurl.com/2wurbtz
> # Bugs assigned to a proxy maintainer without CVS access
> # Every package outdated, bug 340007
> # Removal in 30 days
> app-pda/synce
> app-pda/synce-d
10 matches
Mail list logo
