Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New category for Lua related packages
Looks like the new category is created and the packages are moved! If you have some issue with the pkgmoves, please reopen the tracker bug,open a new bug and make the tracker depends on it. Thanks guys! :) -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: gnome-base/gnome-volume-manager
# Pacho Ramos (06 Nov 2010) # No longer maintained neither developed by upstream since # a lot of time. Nothing in the tree needs it (bug #344331) # Replaced by gnome-base/nautilus. Removal 2010-12-06. gnome-base/gnome-volume-manager signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:23:36PM -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02-11-2010 19:30, Markos Chandras wrote: > - - ewarn "This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not > considered to be" > - - ewarn "a supported server profile at this time. For a supported > server" > - - ewarn "profile, please check the Hardened project > (http://hardened.gentoo.org)." > > As was stated a few times in this thread, simply dropping this ewarn > without adding a warning somewhere that anyone looking for a production > server profile should be looking at hardened, doesn't seem prudent to me. > > - -- > Regards, > > Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org > Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJM0J13AAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEPrEAP/3GNLyH67SLszchOL1wjvctE > xEZ+yCDrTexXmc1A4YzqYKjVicTXgDdmIPThwD274YTGCfOqCzgOalcTqfHEu6X3 > W3044m/YOHi1BeNpNXnLqdyleVFKtDs8YvsZkawUFIgyjMOQ0sKzetyORkk4QE4N > 5kr6c4eGN36uIpe2P7viufgvgxAaJwP4k2xsVmVKOpMzGkGLmq8WNeeGTZZ4Jw9O > LPD70gI+QBtgYYzqFMB5XMxA2ia4kYJibCrrzC9sqnRpfEStXXXSAWcjUn8aslOw > +h4ITENwAqY/exRDLpTHXWpU5SzLz+UU9Y1BG8hKUtKEl++iVjFMn6GePRWjJHA8 > mCmkRJ0ku4RscI73qhKjQQdxPEttfvvyfnaS5JdznJMJ/0MyvWV1MMV+j9eKprQq > rAnRAZPbe1slh8Egnj2Cd4lik2L9ek3hAyLu0LEvW47IEJyi8LF5Z7ar9hN+ZJw5 > IwV22/PYc5g/2Ukl+InHWXjtGrNWx7k3KD5D1O7pwkVnGo5ZRvj0AIgM3u7LWLBb > llIFzf1boE6gFen2WgW+GvKngFtX4c8TqBvMLEBs17S3kESSEIzeqCBCuYqAVMEX > vXO/En3NwlyiZ4bhfOOSgo3eQvclJKM6yCK6gDb8rfZFUptyIicQF1AkyFQw7mjN > Y0UY+STLK4I0oW7bK3Sq > =a9yz > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > I plan to commit my latest patch on Sunday night. Thanks -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org Key ID: 441AC410 Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410 pgpq2uteppZyT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code-In: 13-18 year olds in open source
On 10:02 Tue 02 Nov , Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Thanks to your help, we got enough ideas just in time to apply. We > should hear Friday whether we're in. Unfortunately we weren't accepted. This was a highly selective set compared to GSoC -- only 20 organizations instead of 150. Perhaps next time around... -- Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com pgpNEzJFU1UYa.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Maintainer needed for app-portage/flagedit app-portage/profuse dev-util/libconf
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:56:44 +0100 Torsten Veller wrote: > * Michał Górny : > > Torsten Veller wrote: > > > > > If nobody is interested, I'll mask them for removal in one week. > > > > If nobody is interested indeed, I'd appreciate a longer removal > > period > > Longer than the typical 30 days? Ah, I misunderstood 'one week' there. 30 days are completely fine, and if that week meant the time before the mask is applied, I think I'll be able to do at least a pre-release to fill in the mask description. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: Maintainer needed for app-portage/flagedit app-portage/profuse dev-util/libconf
* Michał Górny : > Torsten Veller wrote: > > > If nobody is interested, I'll mask them for removal in one week. > > If nobody is interested indeed, I'd appreciate a longer removal period Longer than the typical 30 days? Alternatively I can move the packages from the perl herd to maintainer-needed and we wait until the replacement is finished... -- Regards Torsten
Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite app-pda/*synce*
On 11/05/2010 10:29 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> This sucks. *synce* stuff is covered in a our documentation, >> including a PDA guide and a debugging HowTo. Any chance of holding >> off on the mask/removal? > > Added longer removal date. 2011-01-01. > > Unfortunately 0.14 is in so bad shape there's nothing worth stabilizing > for when every single package comes with missing depends, wrong python > usage, other random bugs... and previous versions are even more of a mess. That means feel free to restrict the masks to <0.15 like libsynce is now, as proper ebuilds get committed to tree.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite app-pda/*synce*
On 11/05/2010 08:33 AM, Joshua Saddler wrote: > On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:03:13 +0200 > Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> # Samuli Suominen (04 Nov 2010) >> # Over 20 open bugs, http://tinyurl.com/2wurbtz >> # Bugs assigned to a proxy maintainer without CVS access >> # Every package outdated, bug 340007 >> # Removal in 30 days >> app-pda/synce >> app-pda/synce-dccm >> app-pda/synce-fur >> app-pda/synce-gcemirror >> app-pda/synce-gnomevfs Replaced by synce-gvfs. >> app-pda/synce-gvfs >> app-pda/synce-hal >> app-pda/synce-kpm >> app-pda/synce-librapi2 Found upstream 0.15 also broken, missing #ifdef's for HAL all over. >> app-pda/synce-librra >> app-pda/synce-librtfcomp >> app-pda/synce-libsynce Saved this one for wine-doors as req. for orange. >> app-pda/synce-odccm >> app-pda/synce-pywbxml >> app-pda/synce-serial >> app-pda/synce-software-manager >> app-pda/synce-sync-engine >> app-pda/synce-trayicon >> app-pda/orange Saved this one for wine-doors. >> app-pda/libopensync-plugin-synce > > This sucks. *synce* stuff is covered in a our documentation, > including a PDA guide and a debugging HowTo. Any chance of holding > off on the mask/removal? Added longer removal date. 2011-01-01. Unfortunately 0.14 is in so bad shape there's nothing worth stabilizing for when every single package comes with missing depends, wrong python usage, other random bugs... and previous versions are even more of a mess.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite app-pda/*synce*
Hi, On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 18:48 -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > there was a very recent thread in this ml about these packages and the > conclusion was that they fall to the pda herd. The proxy-user also asked > for help and showed interest in working to become a developer. FYI work fluctuates for me - this and next week is busy (limited/no updates from me), then I have some free time again. Finding a new maintainer would be easiest, I've almost finished SynCE 0.15; becoming a dev would obviously take longer. Happy to hear suggestions, -- Iain Buchanan Man must shape his tools lest they shape him. -- Arthur R. Miller
Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite app-pda/*synce*
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:03:13 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote: > # Samuli Suominen (04 Nov 2010) > # Over 20 open bugs, http://tinyurl.com/2wurbtz > # Bugs assigned to a proxy maintainer without CVS access > # Every package outdated, bug 340007 > # Removal in 30 days > app-pda/synce > app-pda/synce-dccm > app-pda/synce-fur > app-pda/synce-gcemirror > app-pda/synce-gnomevfs > app-pda/synce-gvfs > app-pda/synce-hal > app-pda/synce-kpm > app-pda/synce-librapi2 > app-pda/synce-librra > app-pda/synce-librtfcomp > app-pda/synce-libsynce > app-pda/synce-odccm > app-pda/synce-pywbxml > app-pda/synce-serial > app-pda/synce-software-manager > app-pda/synce-sync-engine > app-pda/synce-trayicon > app-pda/orange > app-pda/libopensync-plugin-synce This sucks. *synce* stuff is covered in a our documentation, including a PDA guide and a debugging HowTo. Any chance of holding off on the mask/removal? signature.asc Description: PGP signature
