Hi,
Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org:
I don't have a long-term plan other than to stabilize the base system
and provide n32 stages. Where it goes from there, I don't know.
So I am sure you coordinate with redhatter.
Though, you'd think with six members of the MIPS herd we'd have enough
On 11/15/10 11:20 AM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
* reducing your keyword set (stable-wise) to a relative small subset
and rethink your normal testing keywords.
I think there is a related point here: when you start with a minimal
stable set, it's easy to extend that set later.
However, if
Il giorno lun, 15/11/2010 alle 00.41 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto:
Using ‘--enable-fat’ selects a “fat binary” build on x86 or x86 64
systems, where optimized low level subroutines are chosen at runtime
according to the CPU de- tected. This means more code, but gives
reasonable performance
On 11/14/10 22:42, Florian Philipp wrote:
Is there a chance to do the same for perl and perl-cleaner?
I understand perl is not slotted at the moment and there are probably
good technical reasons for not doing so but I still wanted to ask. :)
I'm not sure if the Perl team is watching this
On 11:20 Mon 15 Nov , Christian Faulhammer wrote:
I don't want to stop you, but you are relatively new to the real
keywording business. amd64 at a point had over 30 members and could
not work on the backlog in a timely manner. Think about
...
I completely agree. I don't know even
2010-11-03 06:18:01 Zac Medico napisał(a):
When you need to use a new EAPI, why not just create a sub-profile that
uses the existing 'eapi' file support? For example, you could create
10.1 profiles that inherit from the 10.0 profiles, and put anything
requiring the new EAPI in the 10.1
2010-11-15 19:32:28 Zac Medico napisał(a):
On 11/15/2010 10:23 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2010-11-03 06:18:01 Zac Medico napisał(a):
When you need to use a new EAPI, why not just create a sub-profile that
uses the existing 'eapi' file support? For example, you could
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Panagiotis Christopoulos
pchr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11:20 Mon 15 Nov , Christian Faulhammer wrote:
I don't want to stop you, but you are relatively new to the real
keywording business. amd64 at a point had over 30 members and could
not work on the
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:41:17 -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
snip
I'm not planning an ad-hoc at-random stabilization/keywording spree.
I'd just like to have a stable and tested base system.
Sure, but you have to understand the concerns here. You have no
long-term plan, you are underestimating the
2010-10-25 16:03:01 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a):
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:56:18 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-10-25 15:42:00 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a):
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:24:23 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org
On Monday 15 November 2010 11:37:08 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 11/14/10 22:42, Florian Philipp wrote:
Is there a chance to do the same for perl and perl-cleaner?
I understand perl is not slotted at the moment and there are probably
good technical reasons for not doing so but I still
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 07:40:44PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
Some updates to my suggestion:
- Files would optionally end with -${EAPI} suffix.
- The following files would be affected:
package.mask
package.unmask
package.keywords
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14-11-2010 18:41, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 11/14/10 8:36 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
The IA64 arch team does not have the resources to maintain Java support so we
agreed that support will be dropped unless more man power becomes available.
On 11/15/2010 02:02 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
Since none are slotted, I don't understand what outcome you expect by
contacting the maintainers.
At best, perl-cleaner and ocaml-rebuild.sh shall be merged into portage in a
preserve-libs like manner.
In case some aren't aware, I'll mention
14 matches
Mail list logo
