[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in www-plugins/nspluginwrapper: ChangeLog nspluginwrapper-1.4.4-r1.ebuild nspluginwrapper-1.3.0.ebuild

2011-07-13 Thread Patrick McLean 
Er, no I didn't, I'm not sure how that happened. I will fix it.

On 13/07/11 01:36 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
 On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:00:41 + (UTC)
 Patrick McLean (chutzpah) chutz...@gentoo.org wrote:
 
 chutzpah11/07/11 15:00:41

   Modified: ChangeLog
   Added:nspluginwrapper-1.4.4-r1.ebuild
   Removed:  nspluginwrapper-1.3.0.ebuild
   Log:
   Revision bump, workaround to fix bug #374169. Drop version 1.3 as 1.4.4 is 
 stable and has a security fix.
 
 I'm guessing you didn't mean to overwrite the whole ChangeLog?

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: bash arrays in OpenRC

2011-07-13 Thread Ed W 
On 12/07/2011 16:54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
 baselayout-1 vs openrc isnt the issue.  it's bash array support vs
 flat strings.  the former is supported in baselayout-1, and should be
 supported in openrc.  William is talking about dropping support from
 openrc and i've laid out the way to get from here to there.
 -mike

The original vision for OpenRC was that it should be posix compliant.
Please don't revert to using bash features because it creates a
dependency on bash that then makes it hard to support small platforms
such as busybox

At present OpenRC works very nicely on a minimal (embedded) system using
uclibc/busybox in a couple of MB.  Its also decently fast and oldnet
actually seems to work quite nicely for a headless, but heavily dynamic
environment like a router with USB things getting plugged/unplugged

Thanks for listening...

Ed W

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: bash arrays in OpenRC

2011-07-13 Thread Mike Frysinger 
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 13:36:29 Ed W wrote:
 On 12/07/2011 16:54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
  baselayout-1 vs openrc isnt the issue.  it's bash array support vs
  flat strings.  the former is supported in baselayout-1, and should be
  supported in openrc.  William is talking about dropping support from
  openrc and i've laid out the way to get from here to there.
 
 The original vision for OpenRC was that it should be posix compliant.
 Please don't revert to using bash features because it creates a
 dependency on bash that then makes it hard to support small platforms
 such as busybox

please read the thread (again?).  no one is talking about requiring bash.
-mike


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: bash arrays in OpenRC

2011-07-13 Thread Ed W 
On 13/07/2011 19:19, Mike Frysinger wrote:
 On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 13:36:29 Ed W wrote:
 On 12/07/2011 16:54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
 baselayout-1 vs openrc isnt the issue.  it's bash array support vs
 flat strings.  the former is supported in baselayout-1, and should be
 supported in openrc.  William is talking about dropping support from
 openrc and i've laid out the way to get from here to there.

 The original vision for OpenRC was that it should be posix compliant.
 Please don't revert to using bash features because it creates a
 dependency on bash that then makes it hard to support small platforms
 such as busybox
 
 please read the thread (again?).  no one is talking about requiring bash.
 -mike

Fair enough.  I misunderstood we should support bash arrays as meaning
bash will become required...

Openrc works very nicely - many thanks to all who built and maintain it!

Ed W