On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:30:07 +0100
Marc Schiffbauer msch...@gentoo.org wrote:
* Olivier Crête schrieb am 04.01.12 um 18:40 Uhr:
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 15:54 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:51:12 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
/bin/systemctl
* Michał Górny schrieb am 05.01.12 um 09:26 Uhr:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:30:07 +0100
Marc Schiffbauer msch...@gentoo.org wrote:
* Olivier Crête schrieb am 04.01.12 um 18:40 Uhr:
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 15:54 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 16:51:12 +0100
Michał Górny
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 12:08 +0100, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
I meant hight-level only in a way that it is not really needed to
boot the very basic things of a system so that I can get a root
prompt at the console at least. E.g. you do not need dbus to find
and mount the rootfs, fire a getty
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 12:08 +0100, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
I meant hight-level only in a way that it is not really needed to
boot the very basic things of a system so that I can get a root
prompt at the console at least. E.g. you do not need dbus to find
and mount the rootfs, fire a getty
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 01:59:54 +0200
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (23 Dec 2011)
# Missing fltk-1.3 support and forced downgrade of fltk
# in the same stabilization level which makes this gentoo-x86
# incompatible package. Bug 395747. Removal
Olivier Crête posted on Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:31:07 -0500 as excerpted:
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 12:08 +0100, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
I meant hight-level only in a way that it is not really needed to
boot the very basic things of a system so that I can get a root prompt
at the console at least.
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:12:26 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
But init=/bin/sh (or /bin/bash as I use here) DOES help in a
surprising number of cases as long as the necessary storage and input
drivers and filesystem modules are builtin. And a lot of us have
strong ideas about
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 07:27:49AM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
2012/1/5 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
There's really nothing pointless or blurry about this separation.
The FHS has a nice definition: The contents of the root filesystem
must be
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Are you sure? I heard a rumour that systemd will soon require you to
put /etc inside your initrd (since / can't be mounted without it).
While I can't speak to your comments about being unable to restart
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 08:08:44PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Or will /etc move to /usr too?
No, /etc isn't going anywhere.
Are you sure? I heard a rumour that systemd will soon require you to
put /etc inside your initrd (since / can't be mounted without it).
Obviously, you'd have
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 20:08 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:30:24 -0600
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Or will /etc move to /usr too?
No, /etc isn't going anywhere.
Are you sure? I heard a rumour that systemd will soon require you to
put /etc inside your
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:02:09 -0500
Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 20:08 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:30:24 -0600
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Or will /etc move to /usr too?
No, /etc isn't going anywhere.
Are you
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 21:09 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:02:09 -0500
Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 20:08 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:30:24 -0600
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Or will /etc move
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 21:09:35 +
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:02:09 -0500
Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 20:08 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:30:24 -0600
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 23:06:18 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't claim they're crazy. I claim they're sacrificing
functionality, correctness, loose coupling, simplicity, well defined
behaviour, understandability and stability in order to implement
questionable new shiny
Hello
No one from gnome team has time or is willing to keep maintaining
www-misc/gurlchecker
If anybody volunteers, it would be nice :)
Thanks a lot
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 08:08:44PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:30:24 -0600
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Or will /etc move to /usr too?
No, /etc isn't going anywhere.
Are you sure? I heard a rumour that systemd will soon require you to
put /etc
Hello,
I'm going to move systemd completely to /usr soonish and thus I'd like
to submit the following news item for review. I'd appreciate any
comments and suggestions.
-- NEWS ITEM FOLLOWS --
Title: systemd /usr migration
Author: Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted:
120106 Michał Górny wrote:
I'm going to move systemd completely to /usr soonish
and thus I'd like to submit the following news item for review.
I'd appreciate any comments and suggestions.
-- NEWS ITEM FOLLOWS --
...
For this reason, a new revisions of all systemd versions have been
On 01/06/12 05:26, Olivier Crête wrote:
[snip]
The only thing I see them sacrificing is loose coupling, they provide
more functionality than any other init system, more correctness
(seriously, did you ever read most init scripts out there?), more well
defined behavior (all systemd systems boot
On 6 January 2012 06:14, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 01/06/12 05:26, Olivier Crête wrote:
[snip]
The only thing I see them sacrificing is loose coupling, they provide
more functionality than any other init system, more correctness
(seriously, did you ever read most init scripts
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 00:52 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
3) a symlink is installed at /bin/systemd to ensure that current init=
specifications are still valid.
Please note that these features will be removed after the transitional
period and users upgrading afterwards will have to manually
Hi,
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 20:29 -0500, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
Negative effects of removing the /bin/systemd symlink on 2021-05-01: an
unknown number of users who had forgotten to update their grub.conf will
discover that they can no longer boot their systems.
I would suggest not
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 08:44 +0800, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On 01/06/12 05:26, Olivier Crête wrote:
[snip]
The only thing I see them sacrificing is loose coupling, they provide
more functionality than any other init system, more correctness
(seriously, did you ever read most init scripts out
24 matches
Mail list logo
