Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: several obsolete ruby-gnome2 components

2012-04-18 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 23:24 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:53:06 +0200 Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org wrote: # Hans de Graaff h...@gentoo.org (17 Apr 2012) You need to set ECHANGELOG_USER and then browse the tree to fix your ChangeLog entries. No, this is from the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About adding a way to check for bugs referring to no longer existing packages in the tree

2012-04-18 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 16-04-2012 a las 10:40 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: El lun, 16-04-2012 a las 03:04 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribió: On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:55:04 +0200 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Well, I currently manually do eix searching to check it, maybe would be a way to compare

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: sci-chemistry/gchemutils

2012-04-18 Thread Samuli Suominen
I can be convinced to work on this again after goffice maintainers get new version in tree, but for now... # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (18 Apr 2012) # Fails to build according to bugs 348231 and 388509. # Needs a version bump but required goffice version is not # yet in Portage wrt

[gentoo-dev] plymouth maintainer-needed

2012-04-18 Thread Amadeusz Żołnowski
Hi, I no longer use plymouth and have no more will to work on it, but because I believe many users use this package it would be good if somebody take maintainership of it. There's only one serious bug opened at this time and there's no much work with this package. I have also written some howto

Re: [gentoo-dev] plymouth maintainer-needed

2012-04-18 Thread Alex Legler
On Wednesday 18 April 2012 16:03:09 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: Hi, I no longer use plymouth and have no more will to work on it, but because I believe many users use this package it would be good if somebody take maintainership of it. I'll take it for now. Co-maintainers welcome. There's

Re: [gentoo-dev] plymouth maintainer-needed

2012-04-18 Thread Amadeusz Żołnowski
Excerpts from Alex Legler's message of 2012-04-18 16:49:57 +0200: On Wednesday 18 April 2012 16:03:09 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: I no longer use plymouth and have no more will to work on it, but because I believe many users use this package it would be good if somebody take maintainership of

Re: [gentoo-dev] plymouth maintainer-needed

2012-04-18 Thread Alex Legler
On Wednesday 18 April 2012 17:01:28 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: I guess this should go to the wiki. I was asked in the past to move howto from wiki to some more reliable place, because wiki used to be offline quite often. Has this been changed? If you move it, please just know me the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making user patches globally available

2012-04-18 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:35:40 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: Funtoo has support for FEATURES=localpatch, which does the epatch_user thing before src_prepare. I think it should really go after src_prepare, in order to apply patches after those that src_prepare may apply (avoiding

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making user patches globally available

2012-04-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 18 April 2012 12:59:13 Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:35:40 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: Funtoo has support for FEATURES=localpatch, which does the epatch_user thing before src_prepare. I think it should really go after src_prepare, in order to apply patches after

[gentoo-dev] RFC: ocamlopt unmask on arm

2012-04-18 Thread heroxbd
Dear All, I have just emerged ocaml-3.12.0[ocamlopt] on arm and used it to compile mldonkey[ocamlopt]. It seems to work well. it was masked on Apr 18, 2010, , | /usr/portage/profiles$ grep -n -B3 ocamlopt ./arch/arm/use.mask | 31-# Raúl Porcel armi...@gentoo.org | 32-# Fails to build/work |

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ocamlopt unmask on arm

2012-04-18 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:14 PM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote: Dear All, I have just emerged ocaml-3.12.0[ocamlopt] on arm and used it to compile mldonkey[ocamlopt]. It seems to work well. it was masked on Apr 18, 2010, , | /usr/portage/profiles$ grep -n -B3 ocamlopt ./arch/arm/use.mask

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ocamlopt unmask on arm

2012-04-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 18 April 2012 22:14:54 hero...@gentoo.org wrote: How about unmasking it now? file a bug for the arm team to request keywordings. we'll probably say yes. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.