Re: [gentoo-dev] News item about Gnome 3.8

2013-10-22 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: We are pleased to announce the stabilization of GNOME-3.8. Users are strongly encouraged to read the GNOME 3.8 Upgrade Guide to avoid any possible issues relating to the upgrade. Please read the Gnome 3.8 Upgrade Guide:

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item about Gnome 3.8

2013-10-22 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 22-10-2013 a las 08:34 +0200, Ulrich Mueller escribió: On Sun, 20 Oct 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: We are pleased to announce the stabilization of GNOME-3.8. Users are strongly encouraged to read the GNOME 3.8 Upgrade Guide to avoid any possible issues relating to the upgrade.

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item about Gnome 3.8

2013-10-22 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: Neither this version nor the one you posted in your previous message is reasonable as a news item. A news item should be descriptive and self-contained (at least to some degree). It's o.k. to include links pointing to further information, but that

Re: [gentoo-dev] official games repository

2013-10-22 Thread Sergey Popov
20.10.2013 18:31, hasufell пишет: Gamerlay is not related to the games team I am sorry, but it is games team not related to gamerlay. No offense, but gamerlay guys sometims just do their job. So, MAKE it related to Games team and fix stuff, considered broken. gamerlay which is a project that

Re: [gentoo-dev] official games repository

2013-10-22 Thread Sergey Popov
20.10.2013 19:22, hasufell пишет: I am not sure if you have read my list of arguments in the first post. Sunrise is based on that very concept. No user has direct commit access to the reviewed repository, for good reason (not sure what you mean with developer-only). So, what's the problem

Re: [gentoo-dev] official games repository

2013-10-22 Thread Sergey Popov
20.10.2013 20:12, hasufell пишет: This thread is derailed and I have no further interest in discussing here. And again, no offense, but it is not the first time when you are jumped, said, Everything in X is wrong! and then said I have lost interest. It is very mature position to propose

Re: [gentoo-dev] OT: user-developer/privileges in IRC

2013-10-22 Thread Sergey Popov
22.10.2013 07:19, Peter Stuge пишет: I should have included bugzilla among mailing lists+IRC, users can indeed also have elevated privileges on IRC, but never equal to developers. It is radical exclusion and I'm reminded of it every time the #gentoo-dev channel mode catches my eye, painfully

Re: [gentoo-dev] official games repository

2013-10-22 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 04:10:36 +0200 Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Tom Wijsman wrote: There is an alternative solution here; and that is to bring reviewed versions of them to the Portage tree or official games repository, and honor their contributions. That is a win-win situation for

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item about Gnome 3.8

2013-10-22 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:52 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: Lets compare it with the 2.32 one that looks to were valid in the past: That we had less than optimal news items in the past doesn't mean that we shouldn't do better now. I also

[gentoo-dev] Re: official games repository

2013-10-22 Thread Duncan
Peter Stuge posted on Tue, 22 Oct 2013 05:19:01 +0200 as excerpted: Rich Freeman wrote: [Peter Stuge posted...] Everything in the Gentoo project is per definition strictly developer-only. I suppose that it's a function of having the project centered around a foundation. I can't think of

Re: [gentoo-dev] OT: user-developer/privileges in IRC

2013-10-22 Thread yac
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:02:29 +0400 Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote: 22.10.2013 07:19, Peter Stuge пишет: I should have included bugzilla among mailing lists+IRC, users can indeed also have elevated privileges on IRC, but never equal to developers. It is radical exclusion and I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] OT: user-developer/privileges in IRC

2013-10-22 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, yac y...@gentoo.org wrote: Now I wonder if the +m on IRC was set proactively or reactively. If the former it could be worth a try to -m. Yeah, I kind of feel it should be -m, as well. If need be, we can be more proactive about kickbanning people (ops enough,

Re: [gentoo-dev] OT: user-developer/privileges in IRC

2013-10-22 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Dirkjan Ochtman schrieb: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, yac y...@gentoo.org wrote: Now I wonder if the +m on IRC was set proactively or reactively. If the former it could be worth a try to -m. Yeah, I kind of feel it should be -m, as well. If need be, we can be more proactive about

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item about Gnome 3.8

2013-10-22 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: The last revision includes this reference: The guide will also show you how to migrate to systemd as it is the only supported setup now. But the news item cannot contain all the information needed for that - people need to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2013-10-22 Thread Lars Wendler
Am Sat, 19 Oct 2013 19:10:51 +0300 schrieb Panagiotis Christopoulos pchr...@gentoo.org: On 10:43 Sat 19 Oct , Daniel Campbell wrote: On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: ... x11-wm/fluxbox I'm not a developer (but have a completed dev test that doesn't know where to

[gentoo-dev] app-dicts herd is empty

2013-10-22 Thread Pacho Ramos
Looks like it's empty for some time. If nobody joins to it, I will proceed with dissolving the herd in a week or so Thanks

[gentoo-dev] mobile-phone herd needs help

2013-10-22 Thread Chris Reffett
Hi folks, I'm currently the only dev in mobile-phone, and I don't actually use any of the packages in the herd (I added myself just to keep the packages from going into m-n, but I don't have the time to attend to the bugs lately). There aren't too many bugs assigned to the herd at this point.

Re: [gentoo-dev] official games repository

2013-10-22 Thread Markos Chandras
On 10/22/2013 09:54 AM, Sergey Popov wrote: 20.10.2013 20:12, hasufell пишет: This thread is derailed and I have no further interest in discussing here. And again, no offense, but it is not the first time when you are jumped, said, Everything in X is wrong! and then said I have lost

Re: [gentoo-dev] official games repository

2013-10-22 Thread Markos Chandras
On 10/22/2013 09:48 AM, Sergey Popov wrote: 20.10.2013 18:31, hasufell пишет: Gamerlay is not related to the games team I am sorry, but it is games team not related to gamerlay. No offense, but gamerlay guys sometims just do their job. So, MAKE it related to Games team and fix stuff,

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] xattr: centralize the various shims in one place

2013-10-22 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2013-10-21 05:00 Mike Frysinger napisał(a): On Wednesday 16 October 2013 23:42:26 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar wrote: - cStringIO module should not be used. io module is a replacement available since Python 2.6. unfortunately, that doesn't work as well as it should. python 2.7's interface

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] xattr: centralize the various shims in one place

2013-10-22 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2013-10-21 05:07 Mike Frysinger napisał(a): Rather than each module implementing its own shim around the various methods for accessing extended attributes, start a dedicated module that exports a consistent API. --- v2 - passes unittests w/python 2.6 2.7 3.2 3.3 But