William Hubbs posted on Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:03:57 -0600 as excerpted:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 07:53:59PM +, Duncan wrote:
William Hubbs posted on Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:23:07 -0600 as excerpted:
There are reasons to run the rc binary directly; this is how you
should be changing
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013, Pavlos Ratis wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197625#c14
This has reminded me that maybe we should switch to cronie from
vixie-cron as default and recommended cron provider in Handbook. Last
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013 07:42:48 -0500
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
By all means have an @useful-utils set or some kind of profile that
auto-installs a list of packages like openssh, vim, and so on.
However, these are not required to bootstrap a system
Since we do want net-misc/rsync,
On 12/11/2013 03:03 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
Is cronie a drop-in replacement, or do I have to do some thinking when
replacing vixie-cron?
It should be a drop-in. The only change to make would be to remove
vixie-cron and add cronie to the default runlevel.
I noticed two small differences:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:57:55PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
My issue with what we are currently doing is not whether we have a
default network provider in the stages or not, but it is just that the
netifrc use flag on OpenRC is bogus. OpenRC doesn't need netifrc for any
reason.
I think
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 05:56:33AM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, William Hubbs wrote:
My issue with what we are currently doing is not whether we have a
default network provider in the stages or not, but it is just that the
netifrc use flag on OpenRC is
# Johannes Huber j...@gentoo.org (14 Dec 2013)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Not packaged in current
# stable KDE SC 4.11 and later.
kde-base/kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer
kde-base/kdesdk-misc
kde-base/kdesdk-scripts
kde-base/kdesdk-strigi-analyzer
kde-base/kstartperf
kde-base/kuiviewer
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 05:56:33AM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, William Hubbs wrote:
My issue with what we are currently doing is not whether we have a
default network provider in the stages or not, but it is just
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 08:47:01PM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
OK, I see what you mean.
To be clear, I'm not ready to have a stage3 without netifrc. If / when we
update catalyst so that the new stage3 is the sum of @system and
additional packages, we can move netifrc to that
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:57:04 -0600
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 08:47:01PM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
wrote:
OK, I see what you mean.
To be clear, I'm not ready to have a stage3 without netifrc. If /
when we update catalyst so that the new stage3
Markos Chandras wrote:
Please do not let Peter render another thread useless.
Isn't it obvious that the discussion about forks is both related to
cron *and* useful on its own?
It's not really possible to view an entire thread as a single item.
Life is more complicated than that, for good and
You make some good points. I'll answer your questions as best as I can,
but we can consider this thread closed. I will not try to put the
virtual in, but I will come back to the list soon and start another
thread.
In a nutshell, our networking is a beast, and we should try to simplify
it some how
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 06:59:50PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
You make some good points. I'll answer your questions as best as I can,
but we can consider this thread closed. I will not try to put the
virtual in, but I will come back to the list soon and start another
thread.
In a nutshell,
13 matches
Mail list logo
