On Fri, Jun 20, 2014, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 19/06/14 05:20 PM, Steven J. Long wrote:
Well I've spent far too long at crossdev code, only to see this and
realise you can simply hard-mask:
cross-i686-pc-linux-gnu/{binutils,gcc,glibc,pkg-config} in the
amd64 multilib profile, unless
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:01:53PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:04:54AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
A package that hasn't been tested AT ALL doesn't belong in ~arch.
Suppose the maintainer is unable to test some aspect of the package,
or any aspect of the package?
On 07/26/14 19:33, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 07/27/2014 03:19 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
If an arch team isn't going to honor a stable request, shouldn't they
remove themselves from it and say so?
Also, if an arch team does that, does that mean we don't have to file
stable requests for that
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 05:49:07AM +, Martin Vaeth wrote:
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ulrich Mueller:
I wonder if it wouldn't be saner to leave our revision syntax
untouched.
As already mentioned, -r1.1 is only one of several possible ways
how to achieve the same aim; I am
On 08/01/2014 04:52, Raúl Porcel wrote:
On 07/26/14 19:33, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 07/27/2014 03:19 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
If an arch team isn't going to honor a stable request, shouldn't they
remove themselves from it and say so?
Also, if an arch team does that, does that mean we don't
Raúl Porcel posted on Fri, 01 Aug 2014 10:52:21 +0200 as excerpted:
But almost all arches except amd64/x86/arm are getting less and less
popular:
alpha: no new hardware in more than 8+ years
hppa: being phased out IIRC, and no new workstations
(ie, graphics/sound) in 5+ years
ia64: no new
Hi everyone,
I'm email gentoo-dev@ because I'm trying to hit up as many devs as
possible. Hopefully you've seen the recent discussions about what to do
with ppc/ppc64 given the low manpower. Let's get interested people
meeting in #gentoo-powerpc on Monday Aug 4, 2014 @20:00 UTC. If there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/08/14 05:05 AM, Steven J. Long wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 19/06/14 05:20 PM, Steven J. Long wrote:
Well I've spent far too long at crossdev code, only to see this
and realise you can simply hard-mask:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:13:33AM +0100, Steven J. Long wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:01:53PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:04:54AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
A package that hasn't been tested AT ALL doesn't belong in ~arch.
Suppose the maintainer is unable
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:36AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 01/08/14 05:05 AM, Steven J. Long wrote:
I don't know why we can't just mask cross-*/whatever in the
multilib profile, instead of more talk of masking crossdev with a
heavy heart.
Nor do know if that's been done already, as I
Steven J. Long sl...@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
It will probably also cause confusion for comaintainers and
collaborators, especially when INSTALL_VERSION points to a version
that has already been removed.
So use another name that can't be confused.
Perhaps there is a misunderstanding:
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Martin Vaeth wrote:
Quite the opposite, PMS claims that one cannot rely on
anything stored in /var/db
Where does it say so?
Appendix B: Unspecified Items
The following items are not specified by this document,
and must not be
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 09:37:10AM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm email gentoo-dev@ because I'm trying to hit up as many devs as
possible. Hopefully you've seen the recent discussions about what to do
with ppc/ppc64 given the low manpower. Let's get interested people
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Martin Vaeth wrote:
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Martin Vaeth wrote:
Quite the opposite, PMS claims that one cannot rely on
anything stored in /var/db
Where does it say so?
Appendix B: Unspecified Items
The following items are not
Signed-off-by: Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org
---
I don't have time for any more playing with this. Please test it, and
ACK it if it is OK. I will merge it when I get back if it's OK. :-]
pym/_emerge/actions.py | 10 --
pym/_emerge/post_emerge.py | 5 -
2 files changed,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Friends,
Portage 2.2.11 is now out. Brian is uploading the tarball and bumping
the ebuild right now.
Release notes:
- Remove some broken old style virtual code
- Bug # 505428 RO only filesystem check
- Bug # 506186 TaskSequence
16 matches
Mail list logo
