On Sun, Oct 05, 2014, Zac Medico wrote:
On 10/02/2014 07:32 PM, Steven J. Long wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, Zac Medico wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014, Zac Medico wrote:
We control the shell code that launches the requested command, so we can
save the environment after the requested command
On 10/11/2014 12:06 AM, Steven J. Long wrote:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014, Zac Medico wrote:
On 10/02/2014 07:32 PM, Steven J. Long wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, Zac Medico wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014, Zac Medico wrote:
We control the shell code that launches the requested command, so we can
save
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Steven J. Long
sl...@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
Not arguing with your use-case. Just wondering why ed and bc are considered
such major burdens, but polkit+systemd+udev+dbug+glib+glibc+godknows are a
minimal base.
Nobody is talking about adding most of that
In my earlier thread
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/92113 I explored the
possibility to stabilize gcc-4.8, and we have that going now in
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=516152.
Meanwhile I just applied a small patch for chromium-38 that allows it to
compile with gcc-4.7.
Hello
I am wondering about current status of keyring related USE flags:
- gnome-keyring USE is listed as global USE
- libsecret is a local USE
- wallet is local (only used by one package now)
I think we should simply have a keyring USE flag to enable what most
people will want - keyring support.
# Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org (11 Oct 2014)
# Outdated and unused; masked for removal in 30 days
dev-perl/Template-Latex
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
There's a bunch of hype about ubuntu for the power 8 (new power 8 Tyan boards
which apparently exist but i cant find them anywhere.) I thought gentoo always
had a power fork anyway, not sure what the big deal is. I really wish i could
find a board and cpu though.
They need to release some for
I took a look a the list of the current blocker of gcc-4.8 and many /
most of them seem to be hardend or x86 related. Right now I'm using an
amd64 linux with some freaky lto + heavily optimized make.conf
flags and didn't find a gcc-4.8 related bug.
Except the usual list of package just not ready
В Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:02:20 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org пишет:
Hello
I am wondering about current status of keyring related USE flags:
- gnome-keyring USE is listed as global USE
- libsecret is a local USE
- wallet is local (only used by one package now)
Err.. wallet USE flag is
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:07 PM, M. Ziebell ziebell_ma...@posteo.de wrote:
But if anyone would ask me to stabilize gcc-4.8 I would say amd64 ok.
If there is general consensus that this is going to be a stable target
it might make sense to start running mixed stable+gcc-4.8 systems as
widely as
Am Samstag, 11. Oktober 2014, 22:28:08 schrieb Rich Freeman:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:07 PM, M. Ziebell ziebell_ma...@posteo.de wrote:
But if anyone would ask me to stabilize gcc-4.8 I would say amd64 ok.
If there is general consensus that this is going to be a stable target
it might make
On 10/11/14 16:28, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:07 PM, M. Ziebell ziebell_ma...@posteo.de wrote:
But if anyone would ask me to stabilize gcc-4.8 I would say amd64 ok.
If there is general consensus that this is going to be a stable target
it might make sense to start running
On 2014-09-19 10:11, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
I've been working on unifying the PostgreSQL ebuilds for a while now.
Besides just being cleaner and taking a bit less time to compile, it
will inherently resolve a couple issues that are difficult to
workaround, such as cross compilation [1] and
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
I would say the following still should be fixed:
...
These look like some namespace issues, and different use of registers (on
x86). #46 is hardened specific.
Do any of these actually apply to non-hardened
Dnia 2014-10-10, o godz. 21:50:53
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Since commit 0cc4c1ac21a2ea94cfb1f6ff4b461a9e349d47df,
$PORTAGE_BIN_PATH/portageq no longer exists, which breaks
bin/ebuild-helpers/portageq. Note that has_version and best_version
rely on bin/ebuild-helpers/portageq
On 10/11/2014 12:17 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-10-10, o godz. 21:50:53
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
+
+IFS=':'
+
+for path in ${PATH}; do
This will trigger unwanted filename expansion. For example,
PATH='/*/bin'
will trigger '/usr/bin' rather than '/*/bin' :P.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 12:18:34 -0700
Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 11:17:17 +0200
Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/10/14 22:10, Brian Dolbec wrote:
Can you edit whenisgood for a meeting
On 05/19/2014 09:43 AM, Wade Cline wrote:
This patch allows users to re-attempt an emerge after USE flag changes
have been automatically written via --autounmask-write, allowing easier
installation of ebuilds when users are not concerned about USE flag
details. Previously, users would have
18 matches
Mail list logo
