Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 06/13/2016 11:24 PM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > In addition to what Peter Stuge (correctly) identifies as needing to > change, there also needs to be a modularisation of Gentoo-curated > package repositories. > What sort of modularization are you talking about? Would we suggest something like

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 In addition to what Peter Stuge (correctly) identifies as needing to change, there also needs to be a modularisation of Gentoo-curated package repositories. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -BEGIN PGP

[gentoo-portage-dev] Enforced OpenPGP signatures

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Friends, I saw Brian asking Michał to OpenPGP-sign his commits in IRC, to which Michał quipped that we would have if it were enforced. So perhaps we should just enforce it. Most of us do it -- but I see Zac not doing it sometimes, seemingly at

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 06/14/2016 01:48 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: On 06/13/2016 11:24 PM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: In addition to what Peter Stuge (correctly) identifies as needing to change, there also needs to be a modularisation of Gentoo-curated package repositories. What sort of modularization are you

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Enforced OpenPGP signatures

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:41:38AM +0200, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > Friends, > > I saw Brian asking Michał to OpenPGP-sign his commits in IRC, to which > Michał quipped that we would have if it were enforced. So perhaps we > should just enforce it. Most of us do it -- but I see Zac not doing it

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: LINGUAS USE_EXPAND renamed to L10N

> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > This was just my random set of thoughts, so Ulrich knows them while > writing a new version of the news item tomorrow ;) Yeah, sorry, but I haven't found the time yet. I was wondering though, maybe we should have two news items? One now,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New eclass: mate

Here's a diff of the changes based on feedback from this ML, followed by the full eclasses. Once again, thanks for all the feedback. -- NP-Hardass diff --git a/eclass/mate-desktop.org.eclass b/eclass/mate-desktop.org.eclass index 5f92c4f..c57528d 100644 --- a/eclass/mate-desktop.org.eclass

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:12:40 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2016, 02:32:41 schrieb Peter Stuge: > > > > > I would personally be super happy to have my overlay hosted at Gentoo - > > > > So what precisely is keeping you from that? > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New eclass: mate

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:52:34PM -0400, NP-Hardass wrote: > On 06/09/2016 11:54 PM, Jason Zaman wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 08:19:43AM -0400, NP-Hardass wrote: > >> # @FUNCTION: python_cond_func_wrap > >> # @DESCRIPTION: Wraps a function for conditional python use, to run for > >> each >

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2016, 02:32:41 schrieb Peter Stuge: > > I would personally be super happy to have my overlay hosted at Gentoo - > So what precisely is keeping you from that? https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Overlays/Overlays_guide -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:21:45 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > Am Montag, 13. Juni 2016, 09:50:15 schrieb Alexander Berntsen: > > > I still think you're underestimating the need for centralization. > > > What you call a "core/base" package is probably going to end up > > >

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:21:45 +0200 > "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: >> Am Montag, 13. Juni 2016, 09:50:15 schrieb Alexander Berntsen: >> > > I still think you're underestimating the need

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

Am Montag, 13. Juni 2016, 09:50:15 schrieb Alexander Berntsen: > > > I still think you're underestimating the need for centralization. > > What you call a "core/base" package is probably going to end up > > being anything listed in a dependency. That is a LOT of packages, > > actually - we're