Re: [gentoo-dev] libfm requires dbus-glib to build, but it is not listed as a dependency.

2016-08-12 Thread Kent Fredric
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 10:57:53 +0100 malc wrote: > You will want to report that on bugs.gentoo.org, providing the > suggested emerge info etc. please :) > The reference at [1] is your friend. > > Cheers, > malc. > I agree, a bugzilla bug is usaully better. Though I am

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: LXDE

2016-08-12 Thread Tom H
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:16 PM, james wrote: > On 08/10/2016 04:07 PM, Tom H wrote: >> >> If LXQT's too bloated for you, try Lumina: >> >> https://lumina-desktop.org/ >> >> There's an ebuild. > > I did a quick search and did not find a comparison of lumina to lxqt. > I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] libfm requires dbus-glib to build, but it is not listed as a dependency.

2016-08-12 Thread malc
You will want to report that on bugs.gentoo.org, providing the suggested emerge info etc. please :) The reference at [1] is your friend. Cheers, malc. [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Bugzilla/Guide On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 5:58 AM, wrote: > The title pretty much

Re: [gentoo-dev] libpcre.so.3 - Compatibility with Debian

2016-08-12 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 1:48 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > > I regret to say, although it's a well-known problem .. that the Gentoo > bike-shed is never ever going to fall down - as the layers of paint > applied will grossly outlive the materials it might once have been built >

Re: [gentoo-dev] libpcre.so.3 - Compatibility with Debian

2016-08-12 Thread james
On 08/11/2016 07:32 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:27:14 -0700 Patrick McLean wrote: It's not like there is a shortage of packages that install crappy crap on your system... In this instance I agree that we're kinda stressing about the wrong thing. But

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: Desktop

2016-08-12 Thread Raymond Jennings
I think that a superproject can serve as a good rubber-band grouping construct, personlaly On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El jue, 11-08-2016 a las 13:15 +0300, Mart Raudsepp escribió: > > [...] > > It should be kept for the purposes of coordination

Re: [gentoo-dev] libpcre.so.3 - Compatibility with Debian

2016-08-12 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 12/08/16 18:40, james wrote: > On 08/12/2016 10:39 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: >> On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:12:22 -0500 >> james wrote: >> >>> (also, I'm not hung up on 'Jentoo' as a name; perhaps 'Gintoo'? >>> >>> (peace && hth), >>> James >> >> Way outside the scope needed here.

Re: [gentoo-dev] libpcre.so.3 - Compatibility with Debian

2016-08-12 Thread james
On 08/12/2016 10:39 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:12:22 -0500 james wrote: (also, I'm not hung up on 'Jentoo' as a name; perhaps 'Gintoo'? (peace && hth), James Way outside the scope needed here. However we pull off Zhenchoo, its going to be built on

Re: [gentoo-dev] libpcre.so.3 - Compatibility with Debian

2016-08-12 Thread Kent Fredric
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:40:38 -0500 james wrote: > Ok, show us a solution based on your dashed items That's not what were doing here. We have a bunch of different solutions with different trade-offs, and whatever happens has to live with everything else. And so we're

Re: [gentoo-dev] libpcre.so.3 - Compatibility with Debian

2016-08-12 Thread Kent Fredric
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:12:22 -0500 james wrote: > (also, I'm not hung up on 'Jentoo' as a name; perhaps 'Gintoo'? > > (peace && hth), > James Way outside the scope needed here. However we pull off Zhenchoo, its going to be built on top of portage and our package management