Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Android stage3

On 29/10/16 16:09, Benda Xu wrote: > Hi Fellows, > > This is an announcement of the latest Gentoo on Android stage3 tarball, > > > http://distfiles.gentoo.org/experimental/prefix/rap/rap-stage3-armv7a_hardfp-20161026.tar.xz > > snapshot from the latest main Gentoo repository, featuring gcc-5.4,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Android stage3

On 10/29/2016 05:36 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 11:18 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: >> On 29/10/16 16:14, M. J. Everitt wrote: >>> On 29/10/16 16:09, Benda Xu wrote: This is an announcement of the latest Gentoo on Android stage3 tarball, >> >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Android stage3

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 11:42 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > On 29/10/16 16:35, Benda Xu wrote: >> No SD slot on Nexus. We will stress the internal NAND flash with >> millions of ebuilds and rsync :) >> >> That makes me think of squashdelta sync, but probably after gaining >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Android stage3

Kristian Fiskerstrand writes: >>> Actually .. given my nosiness in -pr matters lately, anyone done a >>> write-up for Planet.g.o or suchlike that we can post up to social media? >>> From my own stand-point it might be something the wider community would >>> be interested in, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Android stage3

Hey MJE, "M. J. Everitt" writes: > COOL ! I'll have to give this a try .. got an old(er) Samsung Galaxy > S4 Active, From our past experience[1], Samsung sometimes imposed noexec to /data by kernel hacks. It'll be interesting to find out what it looks like on the Galaxy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Android stage3

On 10/29/2016 06:22 PM, Benda Xu wrote: > Kristian Fiskerstrand writes: > > > I will need first to set up a blog and then draft a writeup. > > Any hints? > You can request a blog from blogs.gentoo.org and ask for it to be included in planet and universe -- Kristian

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: dev-ada/cbind, net-dialup/dtrace, net-nds/lat, app-pda/jpilot-mail, net-dialup/drdsl, dev-util/insight, app-laptop/configure-trackpoint, x11-misc/lxmed, dev-util/ketchup, m

On Sa, 2016-10-08 at 13:57 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > # Pacho Ramos (08 Oct 2016) > # Uses get_libdir at global scope (#593382). Dead for ages. Removal > in > a > # month. > app-cdr/nero I'd like to keep this package, hence fixed the issues, bumped to EAPI=6, took over

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Android stage3

Christmas is coming, I'll enjoy this Thank you! 2016-10-29 17:09 GMT+02:00 Benda Xu : > Hi Fellows, > > This is an announcement of the latest Gentoo on Android stage3 tarball, > > http://distfiles.gentoo.org/experimental/prefix/rap/rap- >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Android stage3

On 29/10/16 16:35, Benda Xu wrote: > Hey MJE, > > "M. J. Everitt" writes: > >> COOL ! I'll have to give this a try .. got an old(er) Samsung Galaxy >> S4 Active, > From our past experience[1], Samsung sometimes imposed noexec to /data by > kernel hacks. It'll be interesting

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Android stage3

Francesco Riosa writes: > Christmas is coming, I'll enjoy this Haha, good point. Should've called it Halloween release ;) Benda

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Android stage3

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Benda Xu wrote: > > Homework received. I have little experience blogging though. > > I will need first to set up a blog and then draft a writeup. > > Any hints? Gentoo can set them up, or you can just use Wordpress or whatever (Gentoo wasn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Android stage3

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 11:18 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > On 29/10/16 16:14, M. J. Everitt wrote: >> On 29/10/16 16:09, Benda Xu wrote: >>> >>> This is an announcement of the latest Gentoo on Android stage3 tarball, > > Actually .. given my nosiness in -pr matters lately,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Android stage3

Rich Freeman writes: > Well, that would be a different approach, but I imagine you could > build for prefix-style install using something like Catalyst and > cross-compile. I have no idea how much tweaking that would require. > The main issue is that unless you use qemu you're

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Android stage3

Hi Fellows, This is an announcement of the latest Gentoo on Android stage3 tarball, http://distfiles.gentoo.org/experimental/prefix/rap/rap-stage3-armv7a_hardfp-20161026.tar.xz snapshot from the latest main Gentoo repository, featuring gcc-5.4, glibc-2.23, and the latest prefix-standalone

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Android stage3

On 29/10/16 16:14, M. J. Everitt wrote: > On 29/10/16 16:09, Benda Xu wrote: >> Hi Fellows, >> >> This is an announcement of the latest Gentoo on Android stage3 tarball, >> >> >> http://distfiles.gentoo.org/experimental/prefix/rap/rap-stage3-armv7a_hardfp-20161026.tar.xz >> >> snapshot from the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Android stage3

Hi Michael, "M. J. Everitt" writes: >> No SD slot on Nexus. We will stress the internal NAND flash with >> millions of ebuilds and rsync :) > Completely out of my depth here, but can you cross-compile and Ah, I was half-joking. Considering the recent advancement of NAND

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: dev-ada/cbind, net-dialup/dtrace, net-nds/lat, app-pda/jpilot-mail, net-dialup/drdsl, dev-util/insight, app-laptop/configure-trackpoint, x11-misc/lxmed, dev-util/ketchup, m

On 10/29/2016 07:59 PM, NP-Hardass wrote: > On 10/08/2016 07:57 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> # Fails to build (#515294), nothing needs it, relies on obsolete >> capi4kutils. >> > > For all the packages being removed due to capi4kutils, how many were > investigated with net-libs/libcapi? For WINE,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: dev-ada/cbind, net-dialup/dtrace, net-nds/lat, app-pda/jpilot-mail, net-dialup/drdsl, dev-util/insight, app-laptop/configure-trackpoint, x11-misc/lxmed, dev-util/ketchup, m

On 10/29/2016 10:25 PM, NP-Hardass wrote: > If you feel that is too high a maintenance burden, fine, remove them > all. I'm merely proposing it be looked at since otherwise we are > potentially removing packages that don't have to or shouldn't be removed. If they aren't properly maintained, they

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: dev-ada/cbind, net-dialup/dtrace, net-nds/lat, app-pda/jpilot-mail, net-dialup/drdsl, dev-util/insight, app-laptop/configure-trackpoint, x11-misc/lxmed, dev-util/ketchup, m

On 10/08/2016 07:57 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > # Fails to build (#515294), nothing needs it, relies on obsolete > capi4kutils. > For all the packages being removed due to capi4kutils, how many were investigated with net-libs/libcapi? For WINE, we transitioned to using libcapi instead of

[gentoo-dev] Multiple misc. Python packages for grabs

Hello, The Python team is dropping itself from maintainers of the following packages. As a result, those packages no longer have any maintainer: app-admin/supervisor app-editors/leo app-misc/yworklog app-text/pdfminer app-text/pylize dev-util/bumpversion dev-util/tailor net-ftp/pybootd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: dev-ada/cbind, net-dialup/dtrace, net-nds/lat, app-pda/jpilot-mail, net-dialup/drdsl, dev-util/insight, app-laptop/configure-trackpoint, x11-misc/lxmed, dev-util/ketchup, m

On 10/29/2016 02:30 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 10/29/2016 07:59 PM, NP-Hardass wrote: >> On 10/08/2016 07:57 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>> # Fails to build (#515294), nothing needs it, relies on obsolete >>> capi4kutils. >>> >> >> For all the packages being removed due to capi4kutils, how

Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple misc. Python packages for grabs

On 29.10.2016 23:21, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > dev-util/bumpversion Added myself as a maintainer. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: dev-ada/cbind, net-dialup/dtrace, net-nds/lat, app-pda/jpilot-mail, net-dialup/drdsl, dev-util/insight, app-laptop/configure-trackpoint, x11-misc/lxmed, dev-util/ketchup, m

On 29/10/16 21:25, NP-Hardass wrote: > On 10/29/2016 02:30 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> >> Someone needs to take over responsibility for the packages >> (maintainership) and fixing the issues then. If not, they should be removed. >> > I'm only talking about the packages that have no other

[gentoo-dev] rsync.gentoo.org rsync modules: gentoo-repo-changelog added, gentoo-x86-portage & gentoo-sec discontinued.

As part of the upcoming change to no longer distribute ChangeLogs in the main tree, Infra would like to announce some updates to the rsync modules. 1. The following legacy modules are hereby discontinued. - rsync.gentoo.org::gentoo-sec - rsync.gentoo.org::gentoo-x86-portage 'gentoo-sec' was a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on Android stage3

On Saturday, October 29, 2016 4:42:21 PM EDT M. J. Everitt wrote: > > Completely out of my depth here, but can you cross-compile a On Gentoo yes its called crossdev[1]. You can have a build system/toolchain for any arch you need to make an entire system or binaries for and them over to what

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: dev-ada/cbind, net-dialup/dtrace, net-nds/lat, app-pda/jpilot-mail, net-dialup/drdsl, dev-util/insight, app-laptop/configure-trackpoint, x11-misc/lxmed, dev-util/ketchup, m

On Saturday, October 29, 2016 11:44:39 PM EDT M. J. Everitt wrote: > > Whilst this may potentially be a contentious topic (and one that g-p-m > has partially attempted to address) there has been a mildly aggressive > policy applied to treecleaning, whereby if something is old and missing > a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus?

+1 for at least having this discussed out in the open. The issue of copyright did tickle my mind when I saw the headers during my dev quiz. On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > > On

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP RFC: Third-party contributions

On 10/28/2016 06:53 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> On 10/27/2016 06:13 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> >>> So yes, it would probably be enough to put such a simple statement >>> somewhere. The problem is: where? ;-) GLEP seemed

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update

On 10/28/2016 06:00 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> On 10/25/2016 10:01 AM, William Hubbs wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> this item is about an important fstab update. In short, people need to >>> move away from /dev/disk-by/* in

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update

Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > WilliamH wants everyone using /dev/disk/by-label/ > > paths in fstab to instead use LABEL= , to avoid issues if udev > > doesn't create the symlinks before localmount tries to use them. .. > UUID is the same situation in this case -- in fstab you can do it by > UUID= or

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update

Peter Stuge wrote: > --8<-- mount(8) .. > portable. The mount(8) command internally uses udev symlinks > -->8-- That's of course only the mount in util-linux. //Peter