On 2018.11.26 18:58, Michał Górny wrote:
> Here's the newest version.
>
> Changes:
>
> - added explicit notion of parent directory (missing in previous GLEP
> but present in implementation),
>
> - explicitly named GNU tar format with list of permitted extensions,
>
> - changed volume label to
Am Montag, 26. November 2018, 02:37:14 CET schrieb Benda Xu:
> Michał Górny writes:
>
>
> > x11-wm/xpra
>
>
> I take this, the "X Persistent Remote Apps".
Happy to help, I'm also using this.
(Awesome unknown app of the year. The one thing that makes Mathematica useful
over a network link.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:45:54AM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> We agree it is hackish, and we agree we can do without. You simply
> exaggerate the problem, IMO, which mostly isn't there, because it works
> fine today. It can also be solved today using shell tools.
I am sad that you don't see
On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 20:17 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Specification
> > =
> > The container format
> >
> > The gpkg package container is an uncompressed .tar achive whose filename
> > should use
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
> Specification
> =
> The container format
>
> The gpkg package container is an uncompressed .tar achive whose filename
> should use ``.gpkg.tar`` suffix. This archive contains the following
> members, all placed
Here's the newest version.
Changes:
- added explicit notion of parent directory (missing in previous GLEP
but present in implementation),
- explicitly named GNU tar format with list of permitted extensions,
- changed volume label to 'gpkg-1.txt' file to improve portability; made
it explicit
On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 13:20 +0700, gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
> > dev-util/pycharm-community
>
> I'll take this one.
>
FYI, zlogene has already taken it.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
OK Virgil,
Virgil Dupras writes:
> Discussing this change on the list? I haven't touched the eclass, I
> simply fixed the xmw-abandoned netsurf package which had been broken for
> 3 months prior to that (and by broken, I don't mean only on Prefix. Why
> talk about 1-1 features in those
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:34:56 +0800
Benda Xu wrote:
> This is a serious regression for Prefix and caught a lot of users
> without a warning. Could you please discuss on this kind of changes in
> the mailing list beforehand?
Discussing this change on the list? I haven't touched the eclass, I
Hi Virgil,
Virgil Dupras writes:
> I've been getting rid of netsurf.eclass' usage. This can soon be
> last-rited. Only two-stabilizations away from that goal.
I am sorry to raise this, but your migration of netsurf.eclass into
dev-util/netsurf-buildsystem is not a 1-1 feature copy of the old
10 matches
Mail list logo
