On 07/23/19 09:02, Jaco Kroon wrote:
> Hi Michał,
>
> On 2019/07/23 14:39, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 00:17 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
>>> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:38:28 +0200
>>> Gerion Entrup wrote:
>>>
What about a compromise?:
Deliver a (prebuild) manpage as package
On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 13:05 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 7/23/19 8:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Make repoman report user.eclass as deprecated by GLEP 81.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
> > ---
> > repoman/lib/repoman/modules/linechecks/deprecated/inherit.py | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1
On 7/23/19 8:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Make repoman report user.eclass as deprecated by GLEP 81.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
> ---
> repoman/lib/repoman/modules/linechecks/deprecated/inherit.py | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git
[2019-07-21 08:36:41-0700] Christopher Head:
> On July 20, 2019 1:22:39 PM PDT, "Michał Górny" wrote:
> >Yes, I get it. User experience is not important if it would mean
> >developers would actually do anything but the bare minimum to get
> >from one paycheck to another. The usual Gentoo
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 09:04:07PM -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 08:50:29PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 15:25:10 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > The QA team would like to introduce the following policy:
> > >
> > > """
> > >
Make repoman report user.eclass as deprecated by GLEP 81.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
repoman/lib/repoman/modules/linechecks/deprecated/inherit.py | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/repoman/lib/repoman/modules/linechecks/deprecated/inherit.py
On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 00:59 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 14:39:16 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > > Failure to do this will mean you're shipping out-dated documentation to
> > > the user.
> >
> > I fail to see how this could happen, unless you'd be using terrible
> >
Hi Michał,
On 2019/07/23 14:39, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 00:17 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:38:28 +0200
Gerion Entrup wrote:
What about a compromise?:
Deliver a (prebuild) manpage as package maintainer by default, but keep
a use flag "man-build" (or
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 14:39:16 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> > Failure to do this will mean you're shipping out-dated documentation to
> > the user.
>
> I fail to see how this could happen, unless you'd be using terrible
> hacks.
What part in my series of steps did you not understand?
All that
On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 00:17 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:38:28 +0200
> Gerion Entrup wrote:
>
> > What about a compromise?:
> > Deliver a (prebuild) manpage as package maintainer by default, but keep
> > a use flag "man-build" (or whatever) that builds the man page for
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:38:28 +0200
Gerion Entrup wrote:
> What about a compromise?:
> Deliver a (prebuild) manpage as package maintainer by default, but keep
> a use flag "man-build" (or whatever) that builds the man page for everyone
> (also the maintainer herself) with use of the crazy extra
Am Dienstag, 23. Juli 2019, 04:00:07 CEST schrieb Kent Fredric:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 21:08:51 -0400
> Aaron Bauman wrote:
>
> > 1. I want some documentation
> > 2. It doesn't ship from upstream (without crazy extra deps)
> > 3. Gentoo guy hooked me up and packaged it pre-built with it
> > 4.
12 matches
Mail list logo
