[gentoo-dev] uid/gid request for net-misc/openntpd

2019-09-02 Thread Paul B. Henson
Per https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693050 openntpd is going to switch to a dedicated openntpd user/group rather than sharing the ntp user/group with net-misc/ntp. Could I please get a static uid/gid assigned for this? For now, I'm just going to hardcode them in the ebuild, and transition

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] acct-user/portage: new user (250)

2019-09-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.75_p2, Repoman-2.3.17_p44 Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- acct-user/portage/metadata.xml | 7 +++ acct-user/portage/portage-0.ebuild | 12 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-user/portage/metadata.xml create mode 100644

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] acct-group/portage: new group (250)

2019-09-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.75_p2, Repoman-2.3.17_p44 Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- acct-group/portage/metadata.xml | 7 +++ acct-group/portage/portage-0.ebuild | 8 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-group/portage/metadata.xml create mode 100644

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/2] acct-group/portage: new group (250)

2019-09-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.75_p2, Repoman-2.3.17_p44 Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- acct-group/portage/metadata.xml | 7 +++ acct-group/portage/portage-0.ebuild | 8 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-group/portage/metadata.xml create mode 100644

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/2] acct-user/portage: new user (250)

2019-09-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.75_p2, Repoman-2.3.17_p44 Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- acct-user/portage/metadata.xml | 7 +++ acct-user/portage/portage-0.ebuild | 12 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) create mode 100644 acct-user/portage/metadata.xml create mode 100644

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: net-firewall/ufw and more

2019-09-02 Thread Hasan Calisir
Hi all, These are the packages that i proxy-maintaining for a while. Becuse of retirement i cannot maintain them any more. UFW is the important one and just stabilized & no-bugs. I hope someone else take care UFW at least. That was a great experience for me and thanks to everybody who

[gentoo-dev] Re: Home directory for the 'portage' user

2019-09-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:04 PM Mike Gilbert wrote: > > I would like to create an acct-user package for the 'portage' user, > but I'm having trouble deciding on a home directory. > > baselayout currently sets it to /var/tmp/portage, and this just seems > like a bad idea to me. I'm pretty sure we

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Home directory for the 'portage' user

2019-09-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:04 PM Mike Gilbert wrote: > > I would like to create an acct-user package for the 'portage' user, > but I'm having trouble deciding on a home directory. > > baselayout currently sets it to /var/tmp/portage, and this just seems > like a bad idea to me. I'm pretty sure we

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] ebuild-writing/users-and-groups: GLEP 81 user data guidelines.

2019-09-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 9/2/19 12:32 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > I can't really agree with the advice given in this section. > > If I'm maintaining a package and an associated acct-user package, I'm > going to keep the two in sync. I don't see why I should have to create > a directory via pkg_postinst when I could

Re: [gentoo-dev] Home directory for the 'portage' user

2019-09-02 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 10:05 AM Mike Gilbert wrote: > > I would like to create an acct-user package for the 'portage' user, > but I'm having trouble deciding on a home directory. > > baselayout currently sets it to /var/tmp/portage, and this just seems > like a bad idea to me. I'm pretty sure we

[gentoo-dev] Home directory for the 'portage' user

2019-09-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
I would like to create an acct-user package for the 'portage' user, but I'm having trouble deciding on a home directory. baselayout currently sets it to /var/tmp/portage, and this just seems like a bad idea to me. I'm pretty sure we have a QA policy against installing files there anyway. If we

[gentoo-portage-dev] Home directory for the 'portage' user

2019-09-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
I would like to create an acct-user package for the 'portage' user, but I'm having trouble deciding on a home directory. baselayout currently sets it to /var/tmp/portage, and this just seems like a bad idea to me. I'm pretty sure we have a QA policy against installing files there anyway. If we

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] ebuild-writing/users-and-groups: GLEP 81 user data guidelines.

2019-09-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 1:48 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > + > + Choosing a home directory > + > + > + In most cases, the default home directory (that is, no home > + directory) should be used. GLEP81 changed two aspects of user > + management with respect to home directories:

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-cpp/gnome-vfsmm, gnome-extra/assogiate

2019-09-02 Thread Michał Górny
# Michał Górny (2019-09-02) # gnome-vfs was deprecated along with GNOME 2.22 in favor of gvfs. # gnome-vfsmm provides C bindings for it, with last release in 2009 # and only one reverse dependency. # # assogiate is the last revdep of gnome-vfsmm. It was last bumped # in 2007, and the homepage

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] bzr.eclass: Respect the EVCS_UMASK variable.

2019-09-02 Thread Ulrich Müller
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/497798 Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller --- eclass/bzr.eclass | 22 -- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/bzr.eclass b/eclass/bzr.eclass index 10bd6bc7e5a..598a0f87fe6 100644 --- a/eclass/bzr.eclass +++

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: app-admin/installer

2019-09-02 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, The maintainer of the following package is retiring: app-admin/installer There are no bugs open. Chris, if you'd still like to maintain it via proxy-maint, please create a new Bugzilla account and give me its' e-mail address. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: