Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > The package is somewhat redundant, because sys-kernel/linux-firmware > installs the same files. (Same for all other sys-firmware/iwl*-ucode > packages.) Should last-rite all of them, IMO.

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] distutils-r1.eclass: Add tests for distutils_enable_tests

Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- eclass/tests/distutils-r1.sh | 67 +++- 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/tests/distutils-r1.sh b/eclass/tests/distutils-r1.sh index d557f6cad534..d5f3e2812ca4 100755 ---

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] distutils-r1.eclass: distutils_enable_tests, handle no deps better

Do not set IUSE or other variables if the test runner does not have any deps, and RDEPEND is empty. Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 23 --- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] distutils-r1: distutils_enable_tests, add 'setup.py' option

Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass index 2edffdb2d7c5..99da6f5111cd 100644 --- a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass +++ b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass @@ -241,6 +241,7

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks?

On 2019-11-13 4:16 p.m., Michał Górny wrote: [ Snip! ] Can automation help with this at all, or is automation being used already? Also to clarify, is the issue here the way that we specify python versions syntactically in all of the ebuilds in the repo, or is it just the way the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks?

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 3:05 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 22:16 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > I'd like to share my frustration at the state of Python in general, > > and Python packages in Gentoo. So I'd like to 'bootstrap' python3_8 -- > > that is, add it to the most common

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks?

В письме от пятница, 15 ноября 2019 г. 15:19:31 MSK пользователь Michael Orlitzky написал: > On 11/15/19 7:04 AM, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > > As i remember some decades ago policy was: revbump needed if you change > > chnages stuff installed on filesystem. So in case of py addition it is.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks?

On 11/15/19 7:22 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > https://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/ebuild-revisions/index.html > Two things on that page are outright wrong: 1. If the package has stable keywords, they should be moved to the new revision without dropping. To commit the ebuild,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks?

On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 15:04 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > В письме от пятница, 15 ноября 2019 г. 13:47:12 MSK пользователь Mart > Raudsepp > написал: > > Ühel kenal päeval, R, 15.11.2019 kell 13:20, kirjutas Alexey 'Alexxy' > > > > Shvetsov: > > > В письме от пятница, 15 ноября 2019

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks?

On 11/15/19 7:04 AM, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > > As i remember some decades ago policy was: revbump needed if you change > chnages stuff installed on filesystem. So in case of py addition it is. So > what > changed? > > Are there some new written rules that says in what case you need

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks?

В письме от пятница, 15 ноября 2019 г. 13:47:12 MSK пользователь Mart Raudsepp написал: > Ühel kenal päeval, R, 15.11.2019 kell 13:20, kirjutas Alexey 'Alexxy' > > Shvetsov: > > В письме от пятница, 15 ноября 2019 г. 11:45:32 MSK пользователь > > Michał Górny > > > > написал: > > > On Fri,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks?

Ühel kenal päeval, R, 15.11.2019 kell 13:20, kirjutas Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov: > В письме от пятница, 15 ноября 2019 г. 11:45:32 MSK пользователь > Michał Górny > написал: > > On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 11:41 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > > > I think problem is more global: > > > * many

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks?

В письме от пятница, 15 ноября 2019 г. 11:45:32 MSK пользователь Michał Górny написал: > On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 11:41 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > > I think problem is more global: > > * many python3_6 packages dont have python3_7 keywords, because its > > maintainers dont bother about

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

This installs firmware for the Intel® Centrino® Wireless-N 1000 device. I no longer have any hardware to test it. The package is somewhat redundant, because sys-kernel/linux-firmware installs the same files. (Same for all other sys-firmware/iwl*-ucode packages.) Ulrich signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks?

On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 11:41 +0300, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov wrote: > I think problem is more global: > * many python3_6 packages dont have python3_7 keywords, because its > maintainers dont bother about it. So if you want to switch to python3_7 you > still need manualy add python3_7 use for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks?

I think problem is more global: * many python3_6 packages dont have python3_7 keywords, because its maintainers dont bother about it. So if you want to switch to python3_7 you still need manualy add python3_7 use for many packages (that actualy work without problems * we need policy for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks?

On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 22:16 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > I'd like to share my frustration at the state of Python in general, > and Python packages in Gentoo. So I'd like to 'bootstrap' python3_8 -- > that is, add it to the most common dependency, dev-python/setuptools. > Simple thing, right? >