/ownpaste20200409-08:12 zlogenebfabc357c69
www-apps/venus 20200409-08:08 zlogene3bba40048f8
Additions:
acct-group/anope 20200330-16:46 whissi 1c3e8b59c9e
acct-group/dnsdist 20200412-14:23
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 11:21:29 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-04-12 at 10:43 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > If you work on the stabilization workflow you may have noticed that:
> >
> > - There are people that rant if you don't run src_test against their
> > packa
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 16 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst
index 68b8e91..d148a25 100644
--- a/glep-0072.rst
+++ b/glep-0072.rst
@@ -1,23 +1,17 @@
---
GLEP: 72
Title: Architecture stability s
Change the handling of slave repositories to the usual notion of 'slave
overrides master'.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 22 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst
index 9ad8b61..68b8e91 100644
--- a/g
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst
index d3afaef..9ad8b61 100644
--- a/glep-0072.rst
+++ b/glep-0072.rst
@@ -96,6 +96,8 @@ whitespace-separated columns:
Additional columns are ignored to allow for fu
Provide a combined description for every status that explains what it
means, how it's used by linting tools and how it affects stabilization
requests.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 46 +++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions
I'm not aware of any profiles that should be set to 'degraded', so let's
focus on the immediate problem of stable/testing. It will also probably
make sense to wait before we start using the third state.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+),
This is really no different from marking the profiles exp, and there
seems no value in having this controlled in two places.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 8 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst
index 61f9c16..0a991
While it should technically be ignored, I don't think it's a good idea
to encourage developers using it for their own purposes.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst
index 5be7941..acc5da7 1
'Testing' has generally nicer meaning than 'unstable'.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst
index 1e906d2..5be7941 100644
--- a/glep-0072.rst
+++ b/glep-0072.rst
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @
In Gentoo terms, 'testing' and 'unstable' are mostly synonymous,
so using the two names for different purposes is confusing. Use
'degraded' instead.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 25 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/glep
Hi,
Here's the updated patch series.
Changes:
- reverted profile directory rename.
- renamed 'degraded' to 'transitional'.
Not changed:
- did not introduce a separate security-supported level as sec team
indicated they don't want to keep sec-supp and stable separate
long-term.
Michał Górny
On Sat, 2020-04-11 at 12:53 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 12:28 PM Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> > On 2020-04-11 17:33, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > 1. We kill both keywords, and just rely on components, or
> > >
> > > 2. I make NATTkA automatically add KEYWORDREQ or STABLEREQ w
On Sunday, 12 April 2020 11:33:38 CEST Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On Sunday, 12 April 2020 10:43:07 CEST Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> > - There are people that rant if you open a test failure bug against their
> > packages and you block the stabilization.
>
> Maybe start ignoring those packages unti
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 10:43:07 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> If you work on the stabilization workflow you may have noticed that:
>
> - There are people that rant if you don't run src_test against their packages;
> - There are people that rant if you open a test failure bug against their
> pack
On 2020-04-12 11:21, Michał Górny wrote:
> This is not a problem that can be solved by a binary flag.
>
> If package's test suite is entirely broken and unmaintained, the package
> should use RESTRICT=test and not silently ask arch teams to ignore it.
>
> If package's test suite is only slightly
On Sun, 2020-04-12 at 10:43 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> If you work on the stabilization workflow you may have noticed that:
>
> - There are people that rant if you don't run src_test against their packages;
> - There are people that rant if you open a test failure bug against
On 2020-04-12 09:43, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> If you work on the stabilization workflow you may have noticed that:
>
> - There are people that rant if you don't run src_test against their packages;
> - There are people that rant if you open a test failure bug against their
> packages and you bl
Hello all,
If you work on the stabilization workflow you may have noticed that:
- There are people that rant if you don't run src_test against their packages;
- There are people that rant if you open a test failure bug against their
packages and you block the stabilization.
So, unless there wil
19 matches
Mail list logo
